Rank: Forum user
|
Hi, have just completed a "COSHH Assessment" using the above website (been recommended to use this format). End result seems very limited (little actual documented information). Any thoughts from others on the suitability of the end result; there are also other documents to print out relating to the assessment. Would this be enough / satisfactory, our original COSHH assessments contain much more detail (or have we been providing too much) - thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I think it depends......
Essentials is quite good if you work with lots of one or two main products eg you are a bakery - flour - sugar
I have never been very impressed if you use it for things that you just use periodically - like oven cleaner for perhaps nitromors. Ie things that are quite nasty but use is infrequent and small amount
So if you were a specialist trade with a finite and limited range of substances you are exposed to then it could work but for the more general "building stuff" then perhaps not that good.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks Bruce - the above (new system) was suggested by an HSE Inspector (as an improvement / way forward). The process does simplify our assessment system (ref: less detail), just not 100% sure its adequate. The obvious answer is to contact them (HSE) again, if they are of the opinion that what we are doing is satisfactory - fine.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I would recommend that you approach COSHH essentials with caution, particularly where you are dealing with potential skin exposure to chemicals. COSHH essentials is based largely on risk phrases. There are thousands of chemicals that do not have risk phrases that, in contact with skin, can contribute to or cause contact dermatitis. For example, there is a number of chemicals that are well known to dermatologists as sensitisers (and feature in the catalogues of suppliers of patch test chemicals to dermatology clinics) that have not been classified as R43/H317.
I have had occasions where, when investigating an occupational skin problem, the risk assessment based on COSHH essentials has shown no significant hazard simply because the workplace conditions that were causing the skin problem did not contain any chemicals with risk phrases.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Question - Would this be enough / satisfactory
Answer - Of course
Why - was suggested by an HSE Inspector (as an improvement / way forward
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As long as users are aware of its limitations (see Chris Packham's comments above, for example), the site is useful for sorting the wheat (those assessments which need specialist input) from the chaff (straightforward assessments not needing specialist knowledge).
LB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with the previous comment. However, the problem arises as to how you know when you need that extra attention. The danger arises when you don't know that you don't know!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.