Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
messyshaw  
#1 Posted : 20 November 2012 02:05:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

I have a building (international financial services) which houses several thousands of people during office hours. There are strict fire evac procedures, with fire wardens, fire coordinators, various assembly points, fire drills etc.

But overnight and weekends, the staff numbers reduce to a skeleton staff. The building houses circa 2,500 in the day, but has less than 100 at night - sometimes < 50. To make things worse, the out of hours staffing is irregular in terms of shift pattern and distribution throughout the building. Plus many of the night staff enter and leave the building throughout their shift

Despite several attempts, it is not possible to replicate a version of the daytime strict evac procedures at night/weekends, nothing seems to be working. For example, how to cover a large building with wardens when so few are at work, and those that are, work in teams and do not co-ordinate with each other. Some work isolated and/or alone (one is often alone on one large floorspace), others in groups together. I am struggling to find a suitable system and am currently just leaving night staff to do their own thing which is less than satisfactory

I cannot be alone here. Has anyone here managed to come up with a system for a disparate group of workers, spread over a large almost empty building out of hours. If so, I’d appreciate hearing your example or any ideas.
davidjohn#1  
#2 Posted : 21 November 2012 22:32:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
davidjohn#1

I don't have a solution for you, but your scenario is identical to that of our building. It's current being reviewed and discussed so I can update you with any thoughts or suggestions we have to make an out of hours evacuation work properly.

At present the night evacuation works but there are still issues and shortfalls which has prompted the review of the procedure.

During the day we operate a phased evacuation plan consisting of a strong fire wardens network and out of hours we switch to a one out all out evacuation due to the limited numbers in the store and fact that theres no warden network in place.

Happy to talk more on this one.

NickH  
#3 Posted : 22 November 2012 10:03:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
NickH

Is there an entry system (i.e. swpie cards)? Is there 24/7 monitored security in place?

If so, could the security team run with an evac system based around who is on site judging by who has swiped in?
roshqse  
#4 Posted : 22 November 2012 14:50:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
roshqse

Well I would just take the mathematical route...

2500 daytime.
50 night time.
Lets say we lose 10 of those in a fire?

That's less than 1% of the maximum occupation.

Acceptable loss I say.. problem solved!

roshqse  
#5 Posted : 22 November 2012 15:02:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
roshqse

or.....


I would go with a 'one out all out' approach too.

Each department responsible for their own roll call when out the building and someone, (building security?) as the liason for Fire service when they arrive?

(The single pump obviously because it's an AFA and the RA says the PDA only has to be 1 pump now. And that will be short crewed...)
Canopener  
#6 Posted : 22 November 2012 15:49:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Messy, sorry I don't have an answer for you but our local fire service are along with many others now considering not responding to fire calls generated by automatic fire alarms systems whether or not connected by ABC etc. This may be something else that you may need to consider and which may not particularly help you to solve your current problem.
damelcfc  
#7 Posted : 22 November 2012 16:31:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

Hmmm, toughie - very similar to something I have never (being brutaly honest here) 100% got to grips with at 2 large sites in the past 15 years.
I have nearly got there many a time but then when it comes to writing it down and ensuring everyone who you have designated a role to has a deputy and a deputy's deputy and...then the bloke at the back shouting 'but what about'......

There is a danger of trying to get to utopia and actually doing nothing at all - I lived somewhere between the 2. Like DSE Regs, you could spend hours and tons of dosh when there are much more pertinent things to focus on.

Keep chipping away but its the SHE Managers 'can of worms' - best of luck
Clairel  
#8 Posted : 22 November 2012 16:57:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

roshqse wrote:
Well I would just take the mathematical route...

2500 daytime.
50 night time.
Lets say we lose 10 of those in a fire?

That's less than 1% of the maximum occupation.

Acceptable loss I say.. problem solved!




Ha ha. Yes. Good answer! ;-)
messyshaw  
#9 Posted : 22 November 2012 18:04:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Nick h: We have a swipe system but it is far from 100% reliable, so cannot be relied on for a roll call.

We already ahead of the game & deal with all fire alarm incidents without fire service intervention as we run a time delay staff search system. That is we do not call the fire service to fire alarm incidents until fire is confirmed by a response team (or the time limit is exceeded, double knock, or certain MCPs are activated).

Roshqse - Your system of letting them die wins, and as it costs nothing to implement, it is sure to be accepted without question by my bosses :- )
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.