When I went for my my second interview for my present role it was mainly about scenarios and how would you approach them as we'll as my relevant experience in the relevant industry

I find that if you have a relevant qualification then it is assumed you know your stuff on legislation. Interviews tend to be focused on testing your soft skills.

Kate's observation 'Interviews tend to be focused on testing your soft skills' offers a very constructive challenge. For it involves figuring out the 'soft skills' relevant to the job for which you've applied and how they are valued - or not - in the organisation where the job arises. This in turn requires you to analyse the range of 'soft skills' of which you can present credible evidence as your career unfolded. One punch line is that interviewers who themselves have high quality 'soft skills' make this a stimulating and agreeable task, whatever standard your own soft skills are, and also provide constructive feedback you can later use. The other is that behaviour of interviewers who lack soft skills themselves sends you lots of warning signs about how they are likely to behave at work. So, why not get down to a good library or bookshop, or browse through Amazon to get a guide to 'soft skills' in professional work? Max Bazerman's guide to negotiating skills and Roberto Cialdini's on Influencing are well-researched, well-written starters with stimulating examples.