IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Where does the '5 or more Employees' come into HASAWA?
Rank: Forum user
|
Hello Everyone
I had to ask because it's beginning to annoy me that i can't find it.
I am fully aware of the requirement to have written RAs if you employ 5 or more from reg 3 of MHSWR, but where is the requirement relating to 5 or more employees for a written H&S Policy in HASAWA? section 2(3) obviously mentions written Policy but not any specific number of employees....
Thanks :)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You can't find it there however hard you look, because it's in the the Employers' Health and Safety Policy Statements (Exception) Regulations 1975.
I hope that makes you less annoyed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Well I never!
Thank you very much Kate, I have learned something today!
Kay
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The exemption is for those with FEWER THAN FIVE employees rather than five or more.
Regards
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Kay "in which for the time being he employers fewer than five employees" was interpreted in Osborne v Bill Taylor of Huyton Ltd 1982 was that regard must be only to employees present on the premises at the same time.
So it is possible that an employer might either
(a) employ 4 on day shift and 4 on night shift or
(b) employ 4 at one site and 4 at another
....and be deemed to be excepted from the requirement, though I've never heard this argument from an employer, probably as they've never heard of the above judgment and they won't have a copy of Redgrave's Health and Safety or other source of case law.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Peter, is that still a current judgement of has it been superceded by a more recent case?
It has been my understanding that "under 5" included all employees, including casuals, temps and labour-only subcontract staff.
If current, there are many retail employers not legally required to write their H&S stuff down.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
David - as far as I'm aware it's the only judgment - and I didn't find it until AFTER I'd left HSE!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
this business of writing things down only if certain things apply is a load of rubbish in my view - try using that as an excuse in a court after you have killed your one and only employee - do what your common sense tels you to do to protect/ cover your self, your company and your employee/employees!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
peter gotch wrote: - - - "in which for the time being he employers fewer than five employees" was interpreted in Osborne v Bill Taylor of Huyton Ltd 1982 was that regard must be only to employees present on the premises at the same time. That was in a High Court case about contravention of an improvement notice. The Court did decide that "for the time being" meant "at any one time", so if fewer than five were employed "at any one time" a written policy would not be required. However, the defendant had 30 odd betting shops (each with about 3 employees at any one time)! So the court then considered whether that involved a number of separate businesses or the one business in several sites? It ruled that it was just the one so a written Safety Policy was required. It would have put the cat among the pigeons if they’d decided the former though I suspect it (or a subsequent case) would have gone to the Court of Appeal.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks Barnaby.
Redgrave misleading me!
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
I live in Jersey and here the Health and Safety At Work (Jersey) Law 1989 has the requirement in Article 4(3) "It shall be the duty of every employer employing 5 or more employees.....". As i understand it this Law was based loosely around the old Factories Act, so this may be where you can find the original source of where "5 or more employees" comes from in UK law.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Cal
Your local legislation is almost an exact rewrite of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 albeit with some of the section numbers shuffled around to confuse!
By the time the Jersey legislation was being drafted, we'd already got the exception to Section 2(3) of HSWA.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Where does the '5 or more Employees' come into HASAWA?
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.