Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
SPR  
#1 Posted : 17 January 2013 14:43:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
SPR

Hi all, I have searched the Internet and I am struggling to find out what the Stockholm Staging ratings actually mean. I have these: R2V 1SN L2V 1SN R0V 1SN L0V 1SN I know they are reportable under RIDDOR but can anyone explain what the figures actually mean? Is the top one at a stage 2 and the bottom one at a stage 1 ??
Rees21880  
#2 Posted : 17 January 2013 14:47:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

Hi SPR Have you seen this link...it seems to be showing what you need? http://www.jniosh.go.jp/...indu_hel/pdf/43-3-17.pdf
james fleming  
#3 Posted : 17 January 2013 14:57:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
james fleming

Lisa Boulton  
#4 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:00:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

Hi SPR, SN stands for 'Sensorineural' and refers to numbness/tingling V stands for 'Vascular' and refers to blanching Stage 1 is least severe Stage 3 is most severe R = Right L=left. If you search Stockholm 'scale' or 'workshop scale' rather than staging it will give you more information. If this has been carried out by your Occupational Health proffesional I would suggest you ask them to explain the results for you. I had similar problem with hearing test results as they didn't explain sufficiently what they meant by the terms and also used to vary the terminology each year so it was difficult to compare results. A quick discussion with with our Occ Health Team and it was easily resolved. I think RIDDOR only applies if they have HAVS AND are regularly exposed to high vibration. Regards Lisa, PM me if this doesn't clarify or you want to discuss further as had some dealings with the HSE and HAVS before.
Lisa Boulton  
#5 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:08:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

Should also explain: if you look at your finger from underside it is in 3 'sections' the section closest to the hand would score a 3 on a Stockholm scale and the tip would score a 1, the closer to the hand the higher level of damage to the finger, so if they are scoring a 1 then it is only the tip of the finger that is effected and the damage is isolated to the tip, if they score a 2 or 3 then this shows that the damage has progressed down the finger and is more severe, idicating either prolonged exposure or high level vibration exposure. Hope this helps explain things a bit better.
teh_boy  
#6 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

chris42  
#7 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:12:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

quote=Lisa Boulton] I think RIDDOR only applies if they have HAVS AND are regularly exposed to high vibration. .
It needs to be one of the defined categories of work in the schedule as well.
james fleming  
#8 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:16:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
james fleming

Lisa Boulton wrote:
Should also explain: if you look at your finger from underside it is in 3 'sections' the section closest to the hand would score a 3 on a Stockholm scale and the tip would score a 1, the closer to the hand the higher level of damage to the finger, so if they are scoring a 1 then it is only the tip of the finger that is effected and the damage is isolated to the tip, if they score a 2 or 3 then this shows that the damage has progressed down the finger and is more severe, idicating either prolonged exposure or high level vibration exposure. Hope this helps explain things a bit better.
'Like'
SPR  
#9 Posted : 17 January 2013 15:54:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
SPR

Guys you have been a huge help. PS - Lisa I will drop you a message when I get 5 minutes - thanks Thank you
Ron Hunter  
#10 Posted : 17 January 2013 23:45:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

The empirical nature of the testing methods used to determine these scales is quite alarming. Most "symptoms" can be faked, and thereafter subject to widespread abuse. This is by no means an exact science folks.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.