Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ANother document to be ignored.
A document by an interested body, no weight behind it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
JJ Prendergast wrote:ANother document to be ignored.
A document by an interested body, no weight behind it Hilarious!! I do love the smell of professional cynicism in the morning!! I have to agree with you that yet another 'competence' system doesn't help anyone. Assessors simply cannot afford to be on all of the schemes, and customers are going to be confused which list to look at. This is very much like the VHS or Betamax video issue of the 70s/80s. I am hanging on until I know which scheme is going to be the most popular/industry norm, or until registration is mandatory (which cannot happen unless the three bits of UK fire legislation are amended)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
'The Fire Risk Assessment Competency Council'?! Really? they should get a prize or something for coming up with that name!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The problem with cynicism is that it often prevents an objective view.
Despite the rather pompous title they have chosen it appears to be a working committee formed of stakeholders in the sector.
The referred document is actually nothing more than a guide to assist duty holders on how they can get their FRA done. It doesn't introduce any additional body or competences and clearly refers to existing professional and other bodies in its content and appendix.
It may well prove of benefit to those seeking guidance on such matters and therefore hardly a matter for dismissal as yet another worthless and unwanted organisation?
p48
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.