Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
moderator 5  
#1 Posted : 06 March 2013 17:14:21(UTC)
Rank: Moderator
moderator 5

The moderating team do not moderate for the accuracy, technical or otherwise, of any contributions to these forums. We appreciate that in these circumstances some contributors may feel that others have strayed far beyond their areas of competence or expertise and wish to challenge or criticise their approach. This often leads to moderating action being required due to the personal nature, style or approach of that response. Contrary to popular belief we, as a team, genuinely like to see the forum as free from moderating actions as possible. So, it was with some interest that we noted this week that the revised IOSH Code of Conduct for IOSH members now includes some specific guidance on dealing with disagreements. Guidance point 3.2. ‘As an occupational safety and health professional, disagreements will happen from time to time. To avoid making disagreements personal, it is important to remember that is often acceptable to criticise ideas but often unacceptable to criticise individuals, particularly in an offensive manner. Respecting other people includes behaving in an appropriate manner. Inappropriate behaviour includes the use of foul language or acting in an intimidating or threatening way.’ For those users not governed by the Code of Conduct then Forum Rule 2 also requires ‘When using the forums you are expected at all times to be polite and respectful towards all forum users including the Forum Moderators and IOSH employees.’ We are seeking the help of all users in keeping our moderating actions to a minimum and making these forums a friendly, supportive place. Therefore, we request that you always seek to express your concerns politely; preferably offering advice and guidance rather than simply judging others. Thank you for your support. IOSH Moderating Team
GeoffB4  
#2 Posted : 06 March 2013 17:35:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
GeoffB4

I am not a number!
Graham Bullough  
#3 Posted : 06 March 2013 23:51:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

This thread prompts me to echo yet again the following points: 1. A good general rule for forum users (pseudonymous or otherwise) is not to write anything in postings in terms which they would not use when talking with someone face to face, e.g. at an IOSH meeting. 2. The first page of thread listings should include a clear disclaimer. Forum users, especially newcomers and casual viewers, surely need to be advised/reminded that postings include individual opinions and contents which cannot be guaranteed as accurate. Therefore, reliance should not be placed on them when making decisions. Furthermore, though this discussion forum is hosted by the IOSH website, postings do not necessarily reflect the policies of IOSH as a professional body or the views of its members!
pete48  
#4 Posted : 07 March 2013 00:23:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Graham, Clearly stated in the forum rules and T&C's. "Postings made by forum users are personal opinions and not those of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive." Don't read the instructions before use; take the consequences? (not you, just a general observation) I see your point but I doubt the disclaimer would be more readily absorbed even if it was emblazoned on every page, just an opinion :-) p48
walker  
#5 Posted : 07 March 2013 08:02:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Can we have a forum rule about not using the forum to polish your ego
SP900308  
#6 Posted : 07 March 2013 08:46:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SP900308

Not an excuse but we are all different! We work in different environments and need to express ourselves in ways to ensure our messages get across firmly to the target audience. For example, as a Consultant it's all very civilised and clinical... no shouting, no swearing and lots of tea. As a Site H&S Manager, probably not so....more assertive, persuasive or forceful with gusto. Therefore, if both parties are discussing something on this forum, it's foreseeable that the approach of one could be quite different from the other. Additionally, one could be de-sensitised or more 'think skinned' than the other. Just a thought! As I said, I don't condone such behaviors, just looking at the demographic.
damelcfc  
#7 Posted : 07 March 2013 09:03:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

walker wrote:
Can we have a forum rule about not using the forum to polish your ego
Do as I do, mutter under your breath but don't let your fingers do the talking - It's hard, when the advice is clearly sound and legal but not remotely implementable. This is the main area IMO of disagreement - a massive high percentage of us are technically excellent but some just live on another planet and only visit UK industrial coalface occasionally. Prioritisation, pragmatism, budget control, mitigation, risk retention (and calculated risk taking) are paramount in these dark times. Dead easy to do a Google search and see what the law says you should be doing - what are you actually doing.....In the real world
Clairel  
#8 Posted : 07 March 2013 09:17:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

ooohhhh....have I missed a bun fight somewhere on the forum????? ;-) Graham, no offence but it's not for any of us to sit high and mighty and preach about not saying anything on the forum that we wouldn't say to their face. None of us are perfect. Having said that I most definately haven't said anything on forum that I wouldn't say to their face. But then I speak my mind in life full stop! On this forum there are fragile ego's and inflated egos. Those who know their stuff and those that think they know their stuff. Those I respect and those I think are a disgrace to the profession. That's what makes up the world that we live in and anyone naive enough to think that it won't result in the odd argument is quite frankly misguided. Add into the mix the fact that the written word is open to misinterpretation due to the lack of tone and body language that goes wiht it and all forums are recipe for arguments (and most are to be frank). I frequently disagree with the moderation of the forum because it doesn't take into account any of that which I have just waffled on about!!! ;-)
John J  
#9 Posted : 08 March 2013 08:51:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Clairel wrote:
ooohhhh....have I missed a bun fight somewhere on the forum????? ;-) Graham, no offence but it's not for any of us to sit high and mighty and preach about not saying anything on the forum that we wouldn't say to their face. None of us are perfect. Having said that I most definately haven't said anything on forum that I wouldn't say to their face. But then I speak my mind in life full stop! On this forum there are fragile ego's and inflated egos. Those who know their stuff and those that think they know their stuff. Those I respect and those I think are a disgrace to the profession. That's what makes up the world that we live in and anyone naive enough to think that it won't result in the odd argument is quite frankly misguided. Add into the mix the fact that the written word is open to misinterpretation due to the lack of tone and body language that goes wiht it and all forums are recipe for arguments (and most are to be frank). I frequently disagree with the moderation of the forum because it doesn't take into account any of that which I have just waffled on about!!! ;-)
Claire, your definately missing a bunfight on one of the other threads.
Clairel  
#10 Posted : 08 March 2013 09:03:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

John J wrote:
Claire, your definately missing a bunfight on one of the other threads.
Where, where.....let me at it!!! ;-)
John J  
#11 Posted : 08 March 2013 09:17:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Clairel wrote:
John J wrote:
Claire, your definately missing a bunfight on one of the other threads.
Where, where.....let me at it!!! ;-)
The clue is cutting fluids.. take a dictionary...lots of big words being bandied about
jwk  
#12 Posted : 08 March 2013 10:56:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

I have to agree with the moderators here. It's better to challenge the message, not the person, and it's usually very easy to differentiate. In the environment I work in it's second nature, and there are now many more people working in say Healthcare than in hairy-chested manufacturing. Challenging the person doesn't help a discussion, where challenging an argument usually does, John
Clairel  
#13 Posted : 08 March 2013 12:59:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

jwk wrote:
It's better to challenge the message, not the person, and it's usually very easy to differentiate.
That's where we disagree. I think the problem is that often people think the challenge is directed at them when it's actually directed at their advice. Fragile ego's.
Clairel  
#14 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:00:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

John J wrote:
Clairel wrote:
John J wrote:
Claire, your definately missing a bunfight on one of the other threads.
Where, where.....let me at it!!! ;-)
The clue is cutting fluids.. take a dictionary...lots of big words being bandied about
Pah. Far too intellectual to be a proper bun fight!! ;-)
damelcfc  
#15 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:31:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

jwk wrote:
there are now many more people working in say Healthcare than in hairy-chested manufacturing. John
Never in a million Years. Many more people working in Healthcare (than before). - That would have worked. Yes Manufacturing has moved abroad somewhat but is still mahoosively more populated than healthcare. In fact - heres a Friday thought/challenge - Health and Safety law/management was INVENTED for factories/manufacturing (does not matter the product). Any H&S professional working outside of/not dealing with a production facility (prod inc Construction/oil & Gas) need only a Managing Safely Certificate as the biggest daily challenge is; Is this RIDDOR or not? and... How far to sit from PC screen/New chair needed. Tongue in cheek slightly (Tis Friday). Have agood weekend all
DP  
#16 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:35:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Any H&S professional working outside of/not dealing with a production facility (prod inc Construction/oil & Gas) need only a Managing Safely Certificate as the biggest daily challenge is; Is this RIDDOR or not? and... How far to sit from PC screen/New chair needed. You would be surprised how many naively believe that too
jwk  
#17 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:39:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

I guess I should have said 'in the UK'. The NHS employs I don't know how many millions of people, and on top of that there's the whole panolpy of support organisations and so on. When I was young Sheffield had tens of thousands of steel-workers, now one plant makes more steel than the whole city did then, with less than 2,000 employees. And as for what we do in Healthcare, well, walk a mile in my shoes; DSE is the least of my worries (actually if you walk a mile in my shoes you'll have my shoes, and I won't be able to chase you....). And my point, which is about styles of communication, is just as valid in manufacturing as it is in service industries. It all depends whether you want discussion or argument. John
jwk  
#18 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:42:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

In fact, John Adams, in his book 'Risk' reckons that the Risk Industry (and he includes Healthcare in that; don't ask, read the book) is the world's biggest employer now, John
jwk  
#19 Posted : 08 March 2013 13:53:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

All I've been able to find is a percentage graph rather than absolute figures but that shows Health & Social Care at about 16% of the workforce, with manufacturing on about 12%, John
chris42  
#20 Posted : 08 March 2013 14:01:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

But surely we can discuss a topic or even argue a point with another, without calling them names, making out they don’t live in the real world or disparaging their intellect. We may have to agree to disagree from time to time, where neither party have been swayed by the others debating points, but this should be amicable.
SteveM  
#21 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:08:28(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
SteveM

As a relative newcomer to these forums I was very much surprised about the lack of humour, yes there is a bit every now and then but most forums I use humour is used all the time to make a serious discussion more fun / tolerable. I was also surprised about the lack of diplomacy when dealing with other people’s opinions, certain people going straight into attack mode as opposed to putting your side of things and discussing the merits of each. I guess that is why this post is here. I am new to H&S and was hoping to use this site to help with my training and general understanding in a professional environment but to tell you the truth I am scared to dare ask something that may seem stupid. I am used to dealing with the general public and therefore restrict my vocabulary to a level that they can understand, in here it appears that big words are required to make you sound as though you know what you are talking about, is this a requirement within the H&S industry? Do I need to use big words to give the impression I am clever or do I use layman’s terms to get the message across clearly? I am very switched on about the environment around me and have a lot to offer the discussions on here but a bit reluctant to join in because the “clever” people may belittle my input. I remember reading someone using the fact that “the lack of tone and body language” can lead to misinterpretation, I tend to change my sentences to avoid this, most forums tend to as well, are we too professional to use emoteicons? There you go its posted now, do your worst ;-).
David Bannister  
#22 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:38:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

SteveM, in a short time of using these forums you will no doubt for your own opinions of the posters: whose opinions you value, whose you discard, whose posts you like, those you don't and readily recognise the downright rude and ignorant, along with the nice guys/gals. Despite the reasons for this thread I firmly think that most on here are pleasant and helpful.
jwk  
#23 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:41:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

David, I have to agree, we ll know who will be diplomatic and who won't. My view is when I'm asking for advice I take the information and (sometimes) disregard the tone, John
Clairel  
#24 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:44:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Yes there is a lack of humour on this forum. I have repeatedly asked for an off-topic section but don't even get a response. Emoticons have been asked for too...and ignored too. I was the one who said about the lack of body language affecting how posts are interpreted. Whilst you may think you have changed your language to account for that, in reality you can't. You may read it one way way when you write it and someone else read it another way when they read it....if you see what I mean. You may think you have written your post to demonstrate how in-tune to your audience you are. But someone else might read your post as being quite arrogant and implying that others are unable to do the same. There are many reasons people's posts can be misinterpreted. Best not to be too quick to judge those reasons and best not to try claim that the same can't be said of each and everyone of us (you included). Could be seen as equally high and mighty. Just not using big words.
Clairel  
#25 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:46:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

oops. Should have quoted SteveM as now others have got in before me, so I'm out of sinc.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#26 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:48:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Clairel wrote:
There are many reasons people's posts can be misinterpreted. Best not to be too quick to judge those reasons and best not to try claim that the same can't be said of each and everyone of us (you included). Could be seen as equally high and mighty. Just not using big words.
Education, education, education. And buy a dictionary
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#27 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:50:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

There was a comment in the Moderator's post about respecting others. Is that part of the new morality that demands respect at every turn, regardless? Or is respect earned? I believe in the latter
Clairel  
#28 Posted : 08 March 2013 15:51:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Ian.Blenkharn wrote:
Clairel wrote:
There are many reasons people's posts can be misinterpreted. Best not to be too quick to judge those reasons and best not to try claim that the same can't be said of each and everyone of us (you included). Could be seen as equally high and mighty. Just not using big words.
Education, education, education. And buy a dictionary
I'm not moaning about the use of big words Ian, others were. Direct your condescension at someone else :P
jwk  
#29 Posted : 08 March 2013 16:04:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

Ian, I think you misjudge what you describe as the new morality, though in truth it goes back at least as far as people like Socrates and Plato. It's respect for the person, and that doesn't entail respect for their beliefs or actions. We should challenge ideas, but I find it more productive if that's done without confrontation, John
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#30 Posted : 08 March 2013 18:08:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Tosh It seems that almost everyone is catching the habit now, of screaming about disrespect. Strangely, it's almost always "don't disrespect me", and rarely "please (or do) respect me", but that is another matter entirely. I blame the schools, but perhaps the parents have much to answer for in not sending the kids frequently enough. In consequence, "respect" seems to appear more and more often in guides, standards and policies, usually drafted by the wishy washy HR brigade who want to use the term without understanding whet it means and how to use the word. Regrettably, IOSH seem to have caught the bug. Expecting or demanding respect as a matter or course is simply ludicrous - though if the screams are associated with the flash of a blade then ignore the ills of modern society, smile sweetly, grovel, and run like hell. But all of this misuses the word, and in some great part mangles the meaning(s). This is a circumstance in which respect should be earned, yet so often isn't. It cannot be mandatory and should never be expected simply for the ability to exist, breathe, type, and speak nonsense. The problem is a failure to comprehend the different verb usage: (i) Show respect towards (ii) Regard highly; think much of The two are not freely interchangeable. You can show respect toward an individual, as you might doff your cap to a royal, a lord, or a bishop, even if you have no time for their person or their position. In contrast, you might regard in high esteem the knowledge and ability of a commoner, whether you like them or not. It's that classical education again, that many here seem to dislike to the point of bitterness. So, what happened to respect? Notwithstanding, it's time to get the dictionaries out again
pete48  
#31 Posted : 08 March 2013 18:54:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Ian , I see respect as something entirely different. Classical education and all. You say that respect can only be earned not given as a right and you mock such an approach. For me it means being treated with consideration and to be willing to treat others the same way. Having regard for others feelings; treating them with dignity. Respect is, after all, the stuff upon which equity and justice are based. Respect is simply the opposite of contempt. One brings only conflict, the other brings a chance to improve. Which then is the more powerful and successful in life? I can clearly separate the difference between respect for intellect, knowledge and expertise from a simple respect for others. However far others may be from my ideals they still have a right to be treated with respect. Yes a right, not something to be earned. To confuse the two is incorrect. I may never respect or trust your opinions but I will always try to treat you with respect. I think that is the cornerstone of modern life and professional practice. P48
damelcfc  
#32 Posted : 08 March 2013 18:56:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

Ian.Blenkharn wrote:
the wishy washy HR brigade
Like it. I usually use 'beads and sandals brigade'.... Another thing to consider is a posters general mood at the time of posting - I have been guilty of the full spectrum of posts from harsh, brash, cocky, sterile, neutral, intelligent, learned and respectful. Depends what I've had going on elsewhere - also time. Sometimes people have more time to give a well rounded considered response, other times a get in quick, top of the head type comment. Also - been touched on a little with the acronym posts a few weeks ago - basic knowledge - we can all sometimes ass-u-me a certain level of knowledge unless specific in the OP. May sound silly but obviously a Super Forum User is not Necessarily a time served FIOSH nor a New Forum User still wet behind the ears. Finally, a persons Industry may not also be their specialty subject (should they have one) and different people will be a different authority on a certain subject at differing levels in their career. Perhaps some obvious bits above but just thought I'd chuck them in the mix.
pete48  
#33 Posted : 08 March 2013 20:10:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Are the terms 'beads and sandals' and 'wishy, washy HR brigade' the same as 'elf'n'safety'? Handy epithets that usually misrepresent reality.
damelcfc  
#34 Posted : 08 March 2013 20:52:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

Absolutely Pete. All trades have them - good and bad. Grease Monkey/Technician. Bean Counter/Finance and close to our hearts the 'Tea and Sympathy Brigade'/OH. Absolutely no offence to any other trade from this Bonkers Conker.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#35 Posted : 09 March 2013 08:01:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

It's a personal thing, but I don't automatically respect piety either
damelcfc  
#36 Posted : 09 March 2013 08:14:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

Manufacturing is currently the third largest sector in the UK economy, after business services and wholesale/retail in terms of share of UK GDP. Manufacturing contributed around £140 billion in gross value added to the economy and employed some 2.6 million people. Source. Office of national statistics. Didn't look for people working in Hospitals but assume its about number 863.
johnmurray  
#37 Posted : 09 March 2013 08:39:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

"Strangely, it's almost always "don't disrespect me", and rarely "please (or do) respect me", but that is another matter entirely. I blame the schools, but perhaps the parents have much to answer for in not sending the kids frequently enough" I suggest a look at school attendance figures first. Then a look at the music scene second. "disrespect" is a "colloquial" phrase much used in the "street" music scene and usually precedes violence towards the "disrespecter". In many cases of poor behaviour a look should be had at the general social attitude of those misbehaving. Which does not excuse bad behaviour but may lead to a better understanding of the route taken in same ! In many cases respect is not earned but assumed, either because of social standing or education. Personally, if someone is talking rubbish I could care less about their education or social standing. In all cases a politician gets no respect, but a lot of suspicion.
pete48  
#38 Posted : 09 March 2013 11:36:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

“Strangely, it's almost always "don't disrespect me", and rarely "please (or do) respect me", but that is another matter entirely.” What is incorrect about using the verb to disrespect? It is defined as meaning to show a lack of respect for or to insult. Thus, please don’t disrespect me simply means please do not insult or show a lack of respect. If I ask you not to disrespect me is that the same as asking you to respect me? I don't think it is. I agree that in everyday use, in some parts of society, it has acquired a sinister use as an aggressive defence but I fail to understand why that should make general usage so unacceptable. p48
Zimmy  
#39 Posted : 10 March 2013 10:30:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Zimmy is, in general, a bad tempered, thick Welsh Boyo with little grasp of the niceties of life. Not taken by the politically correct way of saying things and not at all a people person. However those who have taken the time to get to know me may or may not agree with the above. I was slammed here a few weeks back when bringing up a certain persons unnecessary death via electrocution (Unlawfully killed). Although I thought it was of some importance from a H&S point of view to put this on the forum I was slated for this action by the wonderful Whatshername. However, things have moved on and the matter is being looked at by people at the highest level. It seems that one or two people can make a difference if they stand up and shout!!!
johnmurray  
#40 Posted : 10 March 2013 11:02:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

"It seems that one or two people can make a difference if they stand up and shout" Don't count on it. Shouting to the deaf is contraindicated. Shouting to those politically, industrially or financially deaf is not only contraindicated but pointless. I acquaint the IOSH with the LibDems, both "captured" by "The System" !!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.