Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Steve W1  
#1 Posted : 24 April 2013 09:04:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steve W1

Hi everybody I am sure I know the answer to this question already but professional confirmation of it would be very much appreciated. I have just taken on a new role within a large retail company as their H&S manager. I am just compiling a first aid needs assessment for the company and the following issue has come to my attention. A lot of the first aiders did a 3 day first aid at work course in 2009, so obviously these ran out in 2012. They were then sent on refresher courses, the courses they were sent on were the one day emergency first aid in the workplace courses. My question is this:- were they sent on the wrong course, should they have been sent on a two day refresher. If this is the case how do we stand legally? Just need to get my facts straight before I drop the bombshell. Steve w
DP  
#2 Posted : 24 April 2013 09:18:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Ste, are these FA's just in the retail arm of the business? The stores themselves? Then Appointed Persons are ample for the risk this represents. Of course do the RA and establish this. Obviously for other arms of the business such as the DC's, Construction, Facilities and Store Development you may take a different view.
Steve W1  
#3 Posted : 24 April 2013 09:20:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steve W1

Hi DP The first aiders in question are based in the warehouse, processing section on the company.
DP  
#4 Posted : 24 April 2013 09:41:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Hiya Steve - than it may not be appropriate you need to consider the risk involved in your DC's. PM if you wish? I have full FA's in our DC environment - given the risk.
IanDakin  
#5 Posted : 24 April 2013 11:07:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi Sounds like they were booked on the wrong course. What does it say on their certificates? I would suggest that in a DC they should have the 2 day refresher. I don't use appointed persons in my retail DCs Ian
Lisa Boulton  
#6 Posted : 24 April 2013 11:19:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

Hi Steve, What you said in your first post was correct, in that those staff who held the First Aid at Work Certificate no longer hold the same certificate level as they did not do the appropriate refresher training. They now all hold the Emergency First Aid certificate and your risk assessment should reflect that. How you stand will depend on the risks involved in the work you do, the size of your workplace and the size of your workforce. The duty is to have appropriate first aid arrangements. I would agree with DP that EFA certificates alone are unlikely to be sufficient given what you have said about your workplace. The HSE has a first aid assessment tool on their website, this could help you decide what you need. Regards Lisa B
Lisa Boulton  
#7 Posted : 24 April 2013 11:23:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

Ian, I think it is now too late to do the two day refresher and they will now need to re take the whole FA at Work course. You used to be able to take the refresher up to a month after expiry of your FAW certificate, but is a while since I was involved in FA training so this may have changed, and I have a feeling it was at the discretion of the course provider. Lisa
Kate  
#8 Posted : 24 April 2013 20:03:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

What Lisa says about one month leeway for refreshers is still the case. If you want them to be first aid at work qualified again they will have to do the whole thing again.
dennish  
#9 Posted : 25 April 2013 06:00:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
dennish

HI Steve, I also working in a DC & agree with others, given the risk within a DC environment a full FAAW would be required & as others as said to retrospectively do this they would all need to re-take the full 3day course, Whilst this looks like a clear mistake from the person who booked them onto the course i would have expected the course provider to have raised this issue, as most training providers ask for previous cert's if it was not undertaken by themselves.
Steve W1  
#10 Posted : 25 April 2013 15:05:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steve W1

Thanks every body for your comments It as now come to light that 8 first aiders were sent on the wrong course, I have now had to make arrangements to send them on the full FAAW 3 day course. I am very surprised that the training provider didn't pick up on this at the time. But whats more worrying is that the person that booked the courses was the health and safety manager at the time. He is no longer with the Company ---no surprise there then. Steve w
Canopener  
#11 Posted : 25 April 2013 22:07:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Have I finally lost the plot? For the most part Lisa has ‘advised’ correctly at #6/7 #1 “They were then sent on refresher courses, the courses they were sent on were the one day emergency first aid in the workplace courses”. PLEASE! A refresher course and an EFAW course are 2 different things. The EFAW is a certified ‘stand alone’ course. A refresher course is as the name suggests a …………refresher, something used to ‘brush up’ on the skills gained by attending a previous (certified!) course, either FAW or EFAW. It is not mandatory, although advisable. A refresher course is NOT the same as a re-qualification course. Re #2, an EFAW course is not the same as an appointed persons ‘course’. In fact there is NO requirement for an Appointed Person to attend a course or have any first aid skills. That there are such courses is to some extent a cash cow for many first aid training providers. I am not convinced that there was any mistake on the part of the person that booked them on the course (#9) nor do I see that the training provider had anything to ‘pick up’ (#10) or has done ANYTHING wrong, nor the previous manager. From your description the original FAW had ran out. The confusion arises in YOUR OWN post as to whether they attended a REFRESHER course or an EFAW course. If the former then they need retraining on EITHER FAW or EFAW (depending on the findings of your assessment) on the other hand if they DID ACTUALLY attend EFAW then you are ‘covered’ and there is NO bombshell whatsoever to drop and you will save yourself from looking a ‘prune’ and save you spending even more of your companies budget on further (unnecessary) training. It’s so easy to ‘dis’ your previous H&S manager but I am NOT convinced that he/she has done anything wrong. The first thing that YOU need to do is to take a step back, decide whether they attended a refresher OR an EFAW, and take it from there.
Steve W1  
#12 Posted : 25 April 2013 23:28:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steve W1

Thankyou canopener your comments were very informative. Steve w
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.