Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
safetyman2010  
#1 Posted : 27 June 2013 17:01:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetyman2010

Hi All, i'm having some issue with our QA/Technical depts and trying to get safety improvements implemented as they are claiming they produce a food hazard risk. This is everything from installing mirrors for visibility (non glass mirrors) at traffic routes, catchment trays under machines to reduce oils/spillages, fire warden kits in the factory...... its pretty endlesss and hugely frustrating. I'm looking for case law examples or legal basis for safety requirements trumping food safety requirements as i'm sick of the endless obstacles being placed in our way. Any advice would be great!
SNS  
#2 Posted : 27 June 2013 20:17:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SNS

Go above / around them. Workplace transport regs are a good start for blind spot mirrors etc. Get hold of the accreditation body that your company is signed up to, there are dispensations available under most of the schemes if there is a need and a robust management system in place. Food safety is contractual, Health and Safety is legal.
PGra  
#3 Posted : 28 June 2013 09:00:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
PGra

hi I think you find health and safety and food safety are legal requirements. from what you say this seems to be more about the tech manager having more weight. i would suggest asking him how each particuler h & s measure you want to introduce is going to affect food safety such as if i put a non glass mirror up how is this going to cause contamination of the food or how it is breaching food safety legislation. I am responsible for advising senior managers on both food safety and health and safety in my role. the way i consider food safety against health and safety is by doing an risk assessment to predict likely outcomes if we do one thing for H & S the effect on food safety will be x and if we don't because of food safety the outcome will be y. then senior managers can make an informed dicision. hope this helps
Jake  
#4 Posted : 28 June 2013 09:04:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jake

OP, The examples you cite (if managed correctly) will not affect food safety. I highly suspect that you will not find such case law, as I can't imagine that it would ever be reported as such (even if it did occurr). As PGra stated, it's about getting buy-in from the manager. If you realyl have zero luck with the QA manager then go above their head.
IanDakin  
#5 Posted : 28 June 2013 09:34:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

I agree with the other contributors, also, why not see if other food manufacturers ave had similar issues and then do a site visit to see how they have overcome them. Ian
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#6 Posted : 28 June 2013 09:40:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Have I got it right, that you want your own H&S issues to 'trump' food safety matters? If that is a correct interpretation, then I have no hesitation in calling on you to resign immediately. What might be a sensible way forward is to find a way to harmonise approaches to each requirement, and product a safe product safely. Anything else simply will not do, no matter how frustrating it may be for you. If it's too hard, try harder or pass the problem to someone else who can adopt a more enlighten stance. Tell your employer what your plan is and you will be out of the door double quick time since public knowledge of such an attitude, to put food safety in only second place, will have the press banging at the door and sales plummet irretrievably. And understandably so.
Jake  
#7 Posted : 28 June 2013 10:10:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jake

ian.blenkharn wrote:
Have I got it right, that you want your own H&S issues to 'trump' food safety matters? If that is a correct interpretation, then I have no hesitation in calling on you to resign immediately.
Ian, are we reading the same post?!!! I don't see any reference in the OP to putting safety first, to the contray it seem FS is "trumping" H&S! Moreover, the H&S controls suggested in OP would have no negative impact on FS if managed correctly, so your post mistifies me!
safetyman2010  
#8 Posted : 28 June 2013 19:29:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetyman2010

Thanks for reply guys. I think do have to try and improve relations with QA team going forward. The concern is I try to work with my mgt team when it comes to safety and making improvements- QA just say 'no' to everything and mostly with no quantified reasoning. Risk level doesn't seem to be considered, just an automatic no and in a number of occasions this is not acceptable to h&s requirements, e.g. No fire directional signage allowed in production areas. Just unreasonable & unworkable. I'm not to sure about your comments Ian as I'm not saying food safety is not important or business requirement-it pays my salary so I can assure you that I'm aware of its importance. Thanks for your comments!'
damelcfc  
#9 Posted : 30 June 2013 20:52:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
damelcfc

safetyman2010 wrote:
Thanks for reply guys. I think do have to try and improve relations with QA team going forward. The concern is I try to work with my mgt team when it comes to safety and making improvements- QA just say 'no' to everything and mostly with no quantified reasoning. Risk level doesn't seem to be considered, just an automatic no and in a number of occasions this is not acceptable to h&s requirements, e.g. No fire directional signage allowed in production areas. Just unreasonable & unworkable. I'm not to sure about your comments Ian as I'm not saying food safety is not important or business requirement-it pays my salary so I can assure you that I'm aware of its importance. Thanks for your comments!'
I wouldn't take it too personally safetyman2012, Ian suggested I should resign once in a thread and although a tempting proposition I decided to turn up for work the next day and subsequently ever since. Seriously though, I hear your pain and it does sound like your Technical Dept has a little more weight or can shout louder than the Safety Dept - this is not unusual though for many food manufacturing companies - you have to learn different ways to overcome the obstacles, be smart and focused, stick to the facts and don't give in. Don't get angry but be more assertive - easier said than done but keep chipping away.
Betta Spenden  
#10 Posted : 02 July 2013 21:29:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Betta Spenden

There are no details given describing what food product or beverage is being produced. For example is it baby food which is easily contaminated? Bugs and bacteria can grow anywhere, especially in hard to clean areas. Ever wondered why catering kitchens etc are designed to set standards and made from easily cleaned metal. One single fact stands out to me with this post. Armed with a total lack of information and no facts what-so-ever, some appear to have already made a totally blind assessment and come to the decision that the poster is correct and that the QA department is wrong. What next, fire risk assessments by proxy?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.