Rank: Forum user
|
We recently had an audit from a client on one of our offshore installations. One of the issues brought up was the size of a small workshop/ office and only one means of escape.
The room in question is 20m2 and used to store and work on small electrical items. There is a desk as well for an electrician but the room is not manned at all times. It has been suggested to me that a room needs to be at least 28m2 before a secondary escape is required but i cannot find a where (if at all) this is stated.
Is anybody able to help and point me in the right direction?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's all a little more complicated that considering the room size. You need to take into account the occupancy, nature of work, suitability of the one means of escape, likely speed of fire spread - and of course the travel distance between the fire and a place of safety.
I do some work in Scotland, but tend to apply the English & Welsh fire regs guidance as the legal/statutory requirements are almost identical either side of the border.
That fire safety guidance is available here for free download. There is plenty of info re travel distances, but the entire building should be subject to a full fire risk assessment. Good luck
https://www.gov.uk/gover...e-documents-for-business
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I don't think that there are currently any guidance books in the Communities series for offshore installations though stand to be corrected.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Lisa Boulton wrote:I don't think that there are currently any guidance books in the Communities series for offshore installations though stand to be corrected.
Whoops. I missed that bit Lisa. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
mssy wrote:It's all a little more complicated that considering the room size. You need to take into account the occupancy, nature of work, suitability of the one means of escape, likely speed of fire spread - and of course the travel distance between the fire and a place of safety.
I do some work in Scotland, but tend to apply the English & Welsh fire regs guidance as the legal/statutory requirements are almost identical either side of the border.
That fire safety guidance is available here for free download. There is plenty of info re travel distances, but the entire building should be subject to a full fire risk assessment. Good luck
https://www.gov.uk/gover...e-documents-for-business
I would still go with mssy`s advice on this one though as this would be a sensible reference.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I'm familiar with offshore installations, but not with current practices re detailed FRAs for them. There's general guidance on HSE's offshore page, but no detail.
However I suggest the issue is linked with where the single door opens to - if it's into an area with a significant external fire escalation risk, then possibly someone could be trapped inside and an alternative exit may be appropriate. However, if it's in a location where rapid fire escalation isn't identified as a risk (the installation safety case and supporting studies should help here), then following onshore guidance would be appropriate, given that the comprehensive installation alarm system and muster procedures provide a much quicker and more effective alert to someone inside that room than a typical onshore equivalent.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for the feedback.
I have come across some information in the MODU Code which states:
Within the accommodation spaces, service spaces and control stations the following requirements should be applied:
In every general area which is likely to be regularly manned or in which personnel are accommodated at least 2 separate escape routes should be provided, situated as far apart as practicable, to allow ready means of escape to the open decks and embarkation stations. Exceptionally, the Administration may permit only 1 means of escape, due regard being paid to the nature and location of spaces and to the number of persons who might normally be accommodated or employed there.
I guess the key word is "Should" rather than "Shall" but on speaking to the rig, it looks like they are going to install a secondary escape. It will end up being a lot simpler rather than arguing the point with the client and end up having to do it anyway.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.