Rank: Forum user
|
An OHS service provider has intimated to me that it is a legal requirement for fork lift truck drivers to undertake a medical assessment of there capability to do the job. Comments please.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l117.pdfPara 50 - 54. It's industry practice (certainly in warehousing and logistics) to screen FLT drivers to identify any medical conditions that could impair their safety as FLT operators (latent conditions e.g. heart attack and possible conditions that could flare up e.g. epilepsy etc.). Where a relevant condition was present Occ Health advice was sought.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
My worry is that our OHS provider has informed us it is a legal requirement, which clearly it is not.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Playing devils advocate; paraphrasing - paragraph 50 of the ACOP says you have to RA the health of the drivers - how will you do this without screening to know what if any risks there are? As we know the acop is not legislation but you have to show that you have taken measures as effective if you don't follow the acop. Incidentally we screen all our FLT drivers. Stu
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
HSG6 - Safety in working with lift trucks states on page 8 under 'medical considerations' - 'it is good practice for all operators and potential operators to be screened for fitness before employment and again at regular intervals in middle age. Examination at age 40 and thereafter at fi=ve yearly intervals is recommended'. Operators over 65 should be screened annually.........'
Obviously this is a guide attempting to follow a similar requirement for Group 2 driving licence holders, but it seems your provider has taken things a step further.
Steve Mills
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Whilst I wouldn't neccasarily disagree with the principle of screening, its the blatant lie I'm not comfortable with. Its not the first time this company has say 'stretched a point' to suit there own ends and I have reccomended to my MD that we seek an alternative more 'open' provider.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have some sympathy with you and your provider after having been at both ends of the conversation...
I think we have to remember that just because of extensive lobbying against it by various industry groups it hasn't become law...however you can clearly see from the guidance set out that that is or was the intention.
So although currently not it should be and if in a throw away comment you are throwing away your provider that maybe isn't the best choice...I'm sure you will make the right decsion for your business.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If they say it is a requirement then ask them to show you where it is written in black and white. I have been in this situation before and when you throw the question back at them you are usually hit by a wall of silence!!!
Agree with above posts though that it is best practice but certainly not legislation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Stephen Mills wrote:HSG6 - Safety in working with lift trucks states on page 8 under 'medical considerations' - 'it is good practice for all operators and potential operators to be screened for fitness before employment and again at regular intervals in middle age. Examination at age 40 and thereafter at fi=ve yearly intervals is recommended'. Operators over 65 should be screened annually.........'
Obviously this is a guide attempting to follow a similar requirement for Group 2 driving licence holders, but it seems your provider has taken things a step further.
Steve Mills Hi HSG6 has now gone. The new version of L117 is in place. Although it is basically the same. I use questionnaires to screen, and then if required refer for a medical. Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ian,
You are quite right - the new edition replaced HSG6 earlier this year and it had slipped my mind!!
Nonetheless you are correct that basically the same issues are still highlighted there.
Steve Mills
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
However paragraph 52 says For most work with lift trucks, a standard of fitness equivalent to that for the Group 1 entitlement (ordinary driving licence holders) would be appropriate. Activities such as working in a particularly demanding environment, working at night or moving highly toxic or explosive materials would probably be more appropriate to the Group 2 entitlement (heavy goods vehicle licence holders).
So dependent upon your activities the only need is to ensure that your drivers have satisified the medical conditions for an ordinary driving licence.
Geoff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I'll be complying with the group 1 requirement based on the DVLC recommendations I think.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.