IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Poor Management of Health and Safety in the NHS
Rank: Forum user
|
I have moved into the NHS (None Health and Safety role) from my previous role as a Health and Safety Manager. I have actively tried to keep away from Health and Safety in this new role so as not to be seen as standing on the existing H+S managers toes. However they have recently taken redundancy as a cost saving and their deputy has inherited their role at the lower grade. They too have now gone off long term sick and there have been several issues which to me have not been properly dealt with. After some questioning of individuals around the incidents it has become apparent that whilst they have lots of policies about areas of Health and Safety they have no means of demonstrating that the polices have been applied with. For instance I have asked many managers and members of staff do they have or have they seen any risk assessments for the work they do or control. The answer is always a blank look. I have searched the organisations intranet for the risk assessment but can not find them. I always viewed the risk assessment as the initial building block up on which the rest of Health and Safety Management was built.
So the question is what is happening in other NHS organisations, do you have risk assessments which are written down and readily available?
What do others in other industries think about the situation?
Finally is it acceptable to have a competent person in a 5000 strong organisation with a NEBOSH certificate and for them to be on long term sick with no arrangements for cover by a qualified person put in place?
I am sorry if the questions have obvious answers but having raised this with the governance team in the organisation and been treated as if I had two heads I was just wondering if was me that was wrong in my perception of what should take place or am I really looking at an organisation that after so many years of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Act and the legislation covering risk assessments still do not understand it..
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Unfortnantly that i sht eway of the NHS, the emphysis is more on risk than Health & Safety.
the H&S advisor here is also the non clinical risk advisor, and is moving to become a clinical and non clinical risk advisor. they are looking at a consultant for 2 days a week!!!
its about cost savings now.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am very conscious of the need to tread carefully when responding to as post like this as I am only getting one side of the ‘story’ and/or that you might have your own ‘agenda’. You may well not, but I feel the need to tread a little carefully. Can I suggest that you resist any attempt to reveal the identity of your employer?
However, I would suggest that someone with a NEBOSH NGC is unlikely (though not impossible) to be able to demonstrate the necessary competency required for such a large and varied organisation; or more accurately that the employer could not justify so.
The blank look that you allude to is unfortunately not entirely unusual. There are of course any number of organisations and individuals, including H&S practitioners that do not ‘understand’ risk assessment or more importantly risk management.
Similarly your experience that while you may have polices but that they aren’t necessarily being complied with is also not entirely unusual. (The judge in the Barrow case alluded to such a situation) There are any number of reasons why this might be, including the policy itself.
I am sure others will have their own thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And from my little archive
“There was a written policy on health and safety, which as a matter of drafting was a thing of… some beauty. If it had existed beyond its existence on paper, it would have very substantially mitigated the
blameworthiness of those representing the Borough”
Mr Justice Burnton - judge in the case against Barrow Borough Council following the deaths of seven people (2006)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In 'The Human Contribution', published by Ashgate, 2008, safety psychologist James Reason discusses the 'vulnerable system syndrome' in relation to the NHS and other complex organisations, which may account for some of what you report.
Reason has had a major impact on the CPD and pre-service education and training of doctors. Others are free to learn from his research
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
saf
I think it's blindly obvious from press and external reports that some parts of the NHS are in meltdown. That said, I suspect other large publicly funded bodies are in a similar situation where the management of health and safety is exceptionally poor.
The strange thing is that if these monoliths were a privately funded organisations the regulators would be flexing their muscles by taking legal action against those companies and possibly some individuals within them. It seems to me that there is a standard which is is deemed tolerable for public bodies which would not be so for privately funded ones.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
To Canopener
My agenda is not hidden and I would not dream of naming the organisation. The problem is with being away from Health and Safety for a time you begin to question your own perception of things. I am use to people not knowing about risk assessments or not knowing where they are but what I am not use to is an organisation that simply does not have them.
I was not really casting aspersions on the qualification of the poor health and safety deputy who has been left to carry the organisation flag, although I do think someone with more knowledge and experience may be better placed to defend the corner over such issues as actually having risk assessments in place. What I was wondering about was the legal position of not having a nominated competent person given the long term nature of the deputies absence now.
Anyone any thoughts on these aspects?
Rayrapp
I can not comment about the different levels of treatment for private and public bodies, perhaps I need to take my fears to the local enforcing agency and see how they react!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Research on organisational cultures supports the modus operandi that appears to support Ray's view.
At one phase of my evolution as a safety practitioner, I was asked for assistance in relation to a young and a mid-life female psychiatrist in two different NHS hospitals.
The request in relation to the young one came through the BMA; it was to prepare a report as an expert witness after she had been held at knifepoint in an room in Outpatients' Department, nine months after a report from inspectors to the Chief Executive of the leading teaching hospital who employed her stated that the room should not be used until 4 relatively inexpensive structural changes were made to the room. The young lady was unable to work again as a psychiatrist after the incident and it took her four years to get a financial settlement at figure less than the annual salary of a psychiatric consultant. From memory, nobody was nominated as the person responsible for safety management before the incident; after it, over 100 'man-hours' of committee time was spent talking about the incident and avoided making any decision to do anything different to prevent a recurrence.
The request in relation to the mid-life psychiatrist came to me in a personal phonecall after she had been threatened with a machete outside her office one morning and cancelled her list of appointments for the rest of the day. I drafted a memo which she sent to the CEO the next day. When she had no reply a month later she successfully applied for an appointment in another hospital where she's been quite successful and free from risk of unauthorised execution. A junior HR person did speak to her about her memo to the CEO shortly before she left the hospital which evidently regarded a physical threat to the life of an expensive member of medical staff as routine.
James Reason has set out the conditions which permit this to happen in the reference already given - and he has had considerable impact on critical settings - operating theatres - in hospitals across the UK and RoI.
By contrast, mimimal formal legal controls of the kind that saf is preoccupied with are unlikely to have much relevance in this uncivilised state of affairs.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Having worked and given advice for public sector bodies including the NHS...I have to agree with all the statements put through so far and even when threatened with the regulator there is a very surprising 'so what'....there is no fear of prosecution or even any consequences for breaches of the safety rules..it has got me to the stage after nearly 20 years in safety of changing career! Things were so much easier as a plant manager... :)
On a COMAH site if they got just a hint that this may be the case we would have had a visit from at least 3 inspectors!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Do not tar all of the NHS with same brush. I have worked in the NHS, it is very complex organisation with generally two sides of the house being clinical and non clinical however H&S applys to both sides of the house. Like many large organistions good practice /bad practice can be variable. H&S managers in the NHS would have support from Local Security Management Specialists, Patient Safety Lead, Clinical Audit, Infection Control and a Back care Team etc. The example given is of one hospital / Trust and on the statements posted I would agree there appears to be some weakness in the overall H&S management arrangements but I would hope the picture painted is not taken as generally the case across the NHS.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Poor Management of Health and Safety in the NHS
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.