Does anyone remember this case... Faulty, equipment was sold to an end-user. The fault resulted in injury to the user and prosecution of the supplier followed for failure to supply equipment in safe condition, etc. However, the supplier was an agent who bought the equipment, second-hand from a third party. This third party was also prosecuted for exactly the same reasons. I can't find a reference to this case - does anyone recall this happening? Did I imagine it? Thanks.