Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Garfield Esq  
#1 Posted : 18 September 2013 17:26:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Garfield Esq

I am not 100% on this... As part of a cross examination of CAA/AAIB/HSE Regs. Should an employee injury themselves during an aircraft incident offshore and is off work for more than seven days does it qualify for RIDDOR? Your thoughts are welcome. I think no, but open to being convinced otherwise.
jay  
#2 Posted : 18 September 2013 17:50:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

In cobnntrext of RIDDOR as of now, it depends upon what you mean by "aircraft incident offshore" i.e was the arcraft actually involved in a crash or similar or did the employee simply have an incident in the aircraft? Refer to para 101 of L 73 i.e Avoiding dual reporting Except in the case of offshore workplaces (where HSE needs immediate information about incidents involving offshore installations or pipelines and shipping or aircraft) regulations 3, 4 and 5 do not apply to any of the events reportable under the Acts and Statutory Instruments listed in Schedule 7. This means that RIDDOR does not apply to: a death or injury associated with the operation of a civil aircraft between the (a) time anyone boards it intending to fly and the time everyone gets off; the death or injury of anyone employed on, or carried in, a merchant ship (b) (unless that person is a shore-based worker involved in loading, unloading, repair work etc); any incident involving the escape from control of a radioactive substance; and(c) any dangerous occurrence on board a merchant ship.
Garfield Esq  
#3 Posted : 18 September 2013 18:11:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Garfield Esq

Thanks Jay, The question i have been presented with revolves around the role of respective regulators CAA/MCA/AAIB/HSE etc and avoidance of dual reporting. The scenaro involves an actual crash, not on or near a 'workplace' offshore. My interpretation of 'offshore workplace' would be a fixed drilling installation or similar, not the actual aircraft. Therefore, not RIDDOR...but over to CAA/AAIB?? Correct?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.