Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
KieranD  
#1 Posted : 09 October 2013 16:51:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
KieranD

An Employment Appeal Tribunal has made a decision in the case of Warner v Armfield Retail and Leisure Limited, in favour of the employer. After a site manager with a small company specialising in pub and retail refurbishment had a stroke and recovered as well as he could, the employer laid him offer on the grounds that it was not possible to make reasonable adjustments that could accommodate the degree of mobility which the post-stroke former site manager remained capable of. The EAT judgment illustrates the tension between the doctrine of 'frustration of contract' due to employee incapability and the limited statutory responsibility of the employer to make 'reasonable adjustments'
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.