Rank: Forum user
|
Am I right in believing that if an empty tin has had a defined hazardous substance in it, e.g white spirit or solvent paint, then the tin is hazardous waste?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
correct me if i am wrong someone:
if the empty tin contains less than 5% of the contents and it is dry you can pre treat the tins by holing and crushing and its no longer classified as contaminated waste.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I'm with Allan on this. One source of info is on some of the better MSDS sheets. I have seen it before under the disposal section where the substance may be hazardous but the 'empty tin' (<5%) is classed differently.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It is classified as packaging waste and it is not as simple as less than 5%. Please refer to Example 10 in the comprehensive "Hazardous waste-- Interpretation of the definition and classification of hazardous waste (3rd Edition 2013)"at :-
http://a0768b4a8a31e106d....com/LIT_5426_acd22f.pdf
The Example 10 on page A48 to A50 ( pages 74 to 76 of PDF) is about Packaging waste and contents and includes an example of a paint tin to some extent.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If our waste merchant finds any empty containers with the orange hazard labels or diamond labels in our general waste, they reclassify it as hazardous waste and charge accordingly.
We had a problem historically with fly tippers using our bins, usually to dispose of building waste, which often included empty paint tins. As they were starting to cost us a small fortune, we solved it by getting skips with lockable lids.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.