Rank: Forum user
|
Hi All, hope you all had a good Christmas
I have been thinking about introducing a presentation for risk assessments for new employees, especially the younger generation who may not have come across a risk assessment before in the re lifes.
My idea i would be to introduce this as a concept of crossing the road , keeping in simple and one that we could all understand.
I would explain it as : it is nothing new and that they already do it, perhaps even subconciously! The best example is crossing the road - they will choose somewhere suitable to cross, they will look for oncoming traffic and judge its speed, they will take into consideration how wide the road is and whether to cross in one go or reach an half-way point, they will take into consideration anyone else who is with them i.e.children, elderly people etc. They will then calculate when it is safe to cross. All this in a matter of seconds/minutes? ...and what have they done? Assessed the risks, decided how to reduce them, taken into account others who may be affected, and finally - reached a decision to carry out the task safely! The only thing they haven't done is to record it!
We would be great to get others thoughts on this and bounce some ideas, or would any of you know of any presentations out there that i could use for this ?
Mike
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I once did similar with a group of hardened construction workers, you know the type that would eat you for breakfast, if you get my drift?
I used the example of changing a wheel at the side of the road.
There are so many variables to introduce and they all took great interest and gave so much input it was really so satisfactory for me and they all seemed to get the principal and understood the process.
Happy to say they all enjoyed it so much that I walked out of the session still in one piece.
Happy new year all.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Yes ,
I know what you mean we often get rig workers in for courses and the sit and stare as they are taken through yet another safety induction baring in mind that it is on there time off so never amused .
Another example i was thinking of was the risk assessment you yourself would have before driving your car but as you say there are some great examples to use
You have a great new year too
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
"If indeed we all do it all the time for things that have life threatening possibilities and we do it all so well and with little thought then why do we need to have all this....."
This is a question you will need to have answers for if you take this route. Even if they don't ask it they will be thinking it.
Surprisingly most kids do get an understanding of risk during their education but applied to their current experience i.e. not specifically work related. They may have, for example, done road safety stuff as young as 7 or 8. Later on they will cover other life risks such as drugs alcohol etc. Interestingly though it is about recognising danger and what they need to do to make the best decisions. There is nothing much about understanding the processes that they use. Some interesting parallels there for adults?
Presenting it in a similar manner can be helpful. More people grasp the concept of danger than do the concept of risk. I also found it better to ask adult groups to suggest scenarios but always have some set ones just in case.
p48
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I totally agree with you about the understanding of 'Danger'. People do not generally see 'Risk' as something to worry about, but Danger is another matter.
I think the idea of 'risk' has come out of business jargon, it's purely safety speak. When we see something that looks a bit iffy, we say 'it's dangerous' not 'it's a risk'.
Road signs do not warn drivers of risks ahead, they say Danger ahead.
Happy New Year.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Most, you will find, will readily identify the hazards and identify the risk controls BUT do not put them into effect once they are on the job. Now that is the real problem to address as part of the discussion.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think crossing the road is a really bad example to use, because everyone does it wrong and nearly everyone nearly always gets away with it.
I work in an office with a supermarket diagonally across the road. Most people get their lunchtime sandwich from the supermarket. About 100 yds down the road is a pelican crossing. At lunchtime, how many people do you think walk down to the pelican? Those that don't, how many do you think stop at the kerb, look right and left and right again and then walk straight across?
Everyone knows the green cross code, and practically no-one applies it. They nearly always get away with it. If you use this in almost any safety context, the thought process goes "yeah, I know the green cross code, but I don't actually do it like that. Yeah I know I should follow the method statement, but..."
I use green cross code to make exactly that point talking to designers about CDM - yes the contractor should use a harness to access this high place, and yes the operatives know they should clip on, but maybe they won't. We all take shortcuts, even when they save us only seconds and might cost us our life - just like the green cross code. So you should make it so that they don't need the harness, and don't need to clip on, and then even if they are as slapdash as you are when you cross the road, they won't be dead.
The changing a wheel is a much better example - they probably do that rarely enough that they aren't cavalier about it, but often enough that they can think of hazards.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
While I agree with keeping the training simple I would use a topic which is task specific toy your operations. This way your target audience will be able to identify with the subject making the training more open for two way discussion with the trainer. This has worked for me while delivering this type of training in the past.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have used the following example as a thought experiment from a psychological point of view. I ask people to imagine they are at a train station and to consder the risks to themselves. Most people acknowledge that train stations are dangerous and have several areas where harm can be done. Then I ask them to imagine they are at the same train station and they have a 3 year old child with them. Even those who were quite laid back about their own safety usually admit they have a grip on the 3 year old's hand. Then I ask them to consider their risk assessments at work in the same way. It tightens things up a bit. They don't have to be too literal as that might stop some businesses functioning but it is always a good thought experiment that is based in everyone's experience and not a specific workplace.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.