Rank: Super forum user
|
Colleagues
Does anybody have specific policies, procedures and opinions with regards to sharing information about employees with certain medical conditions e.g. HIV in day to day working with the employees around them
Circumstance: Person with HIV has been honest and up front about their condition and they simply want to start work ---- this is not a NHS situation or similar it is a day to day job but with people and children in proximity and we now know that HIV is more easily transmitted and thus caught than was origionally thought/broadcast
NB: As far as I am aware the HSE has yet to issue specific information about such situations and answer questions about the subject area
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There is comprehesive guidance regarding " Protection against blood-borne infections in the workplace: HIV and Hepatitis" by the HSE Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens
http://www.hse.gov.uk/biosafety/diseases/bbv.pdf
Regarding medical confidentiality and internal policies, in most cases one would not share /advertise the information widely, but with those who need to know if it is absoultely essential for control measures.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
J
TA!
whilst I have that HSE info your worthy comment; -
"........with those who need to know if it is absolutely essential for control measures ......." is VVIP and understood. However I have specifically asked the HSE to confirm this very important point as it does not address the area in the afore noted guidance
thanks again
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Colleagues
more input / opinions would be helpful noting that risk management is not a HR issue
Regards all
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
JM - TA!
Whilst all the guidance I have looked at quotes things like the Equality Act etc. and makes the point that we should not discriminate against a HIV carrier [and rightly so] there is no guidance about the reverse situation e.g. where a none HIV person may have to work with a HIV carrier thus unwittingly putting themselves at risk? All guidance is one way only
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You may also need to consider that disclosure of sensitive medical/sexual/social information is regulated. The risks attached to cross infection with HIV are extremely low. For instance, Chlamydia is over 30 times as infectious, and is best described as endemic. Hep C has a similar profile as HIV, and if untreated is as likely to lead to premature death.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
First-aiders spring to mind but I believe the way theur carry out their activities these days protect against infection anyway?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
bob,
Your post seems to imply that you think there is a risk to employees working with someone with HIV. Outside of a clinical (medical) setting I would NOT consider this to be the case.
The main concern over HIV would be if someone is undertaking 'exposure prone procedures/EPP' as a doctor/dentist/midwife etc and there is clear guidance on what these are. There is otherwise little risk to employees in other workplace settings. In a medical setting, someone would need to be passed fit by occupational health first to undertake EPP.
As others have pointed out good practice is not to disclose any medical information unless absolutely necessary. Even in a medical setting all I would say is that someone cannot undertake EPP without specifically mentioning HIV. This should be covered under you company's equality/diversity/fitness for work policies/etc. If you don't have them then speak with HR/look at ACAS website.
The first aid argument is nonsense. You should adopt universal procedures to reduce the chance of a blood bourne virus exposure in any case - so first aiders DO NOT NEED to know someone's HIV status.
I would add that HIV still has a stigma and that if the employee in question chooses to let his colleagues know then this should be good in reducing stigma in totality... but it should be their decision (not the businesses) and they should be aware that other employees (rightly or wrongly) might hold unothodox views.
If you want to present any evidence contrary to my post, then I am happy to address it directly.
Regards,
Mark
DOI Consultant in Occupational Medicine
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Sorry, should add I agree with safety amateur above (not saying his/her post is nonsense!)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I've always advised to consider all body fluids as infectious so no need to advise anyone of any illness/condition you or they may have.
When a previous employee with HIV cut herself with a knife the first aider went to touch her without gloves, person stopped them.
Other medical conditions e.g. diabetes, epilepsy, allergies etc disclosure, or not, is after discussion between employee and their manager as to whether they need someone else to know to administer epi pen etc.
p.s. when it came out that above mentioned person had HIV some people were very bigoted (possibly afraid).
Lilian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I must admit, I was waiting to see if Ian B had something to say.
I am pleased to see the posts at #7 and #9. The issue for me is what is the risk? The chances are that we might all be working with, friends with or come into contact with people with HIV or Hepatitis and not only do we not know that this is the case, but the person who has it may not know either (because they are undiagnosed)
If the risk of occupational exposure is low/unlikely (and I would suspect that it is unless you have assessed to the contrary), then I suggest you need do little or nothing and that includes NOT informing your first aiders.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.