Rank: Forum user
|
Good Afternoon All,
I have had a question asked by me that I thought would be useful to put on here for discussion:
"Do we need to measure lung function capacity at all?"
Now I know that you can get devices that can do this and we could take measurements and record them for a baseline reading and then further measuring but would it hold any actual value?
If an employee feels there is an issue and it warrants it than an OH review would be done.
Where would we stand on this?
I welcome all comments ands suggestions on this
Vicki
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Vicki,
What kind of business/ industry are you in? Someone who works in a coal mine or biomass plant, or a diver for example then yes. Someone who drives a bus or a checkout no. If the work involves a measure of cardio pulmonory stress or exposure to inhalable whatevers it's either a good idea or required by regs. If it's not required then I wouldn't do it, not because the data is of no use but because I'm pretty sure you will have something that is then covered by data protection and all the fun and games that brings,
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi VC,
It will depend on what substances that you are using. If the substance is known to cause occupational asthma you are expected to control and monitor this (potential) exposure as part of your COSHH management.
If you have OH in place already, they will be able to advise you on this.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/guidance/g402.pdf
I hope that helps.
Pete
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hello,
Thank you for your responses. I work for an engineering firm and we perform welding and grinding. The extraction system has been identified as not fit and we are in the process of getting that changed.
I will also go and have a look at the link as well and get my head into that as well.
Vicki
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If the employee/s have already been exposed to excessive fume/dust, due to no RPE or ineffective LEV, then using spiometry will only start the "baseline" from an already damaged system.
The reality of spirometry for testing lung function, with fainting of the subject being something you will eventually experience, means that health professionals will need to be enlisted.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Vcollier,
I would be interested to know who "we" are. It would be dangerous on so many levels for anybody other than occupational health specilaists to be carrying out lung function tests, irrespective of the substances involved or the reason for the tests.
Lung function tests are identified by legislation and/or occupational health assessments, whether for baseline or other testing and my advise would be that to avoid falling foul of of disability provisions in the Equality Act, data protection, common law of confidentiality and contract issues, these tests should only be undertaken by appropriate specialists.
Regards.
DJ.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.