Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ehsa  
#1 Posted : 27 June 2014 13:43:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ehsa

Hi all, I have an incident in one of my premises where a flash back arrestor failed to work correctly and this resulted with a sustained flash fire occurring on the valve of the oxyacetylene bottle. I have asked the head of maintenance why the arrestor failed and what maintenance or testing he conducts on the arrestor. He has replied that the operative gives a visual inspection prior to use and that's about it. My questions are the following, are there any methods to test the correct functioning of the flash back arrestor? Would annual testing be recommended in the product specification/manual? Thanks and best regards
pradeesh  
#2 Posted : 27 June 2014 14:27:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pradeesh

UK standards as follows:-In accordance with the requirements of the British Compressed Gases Association Code of Practice 7 – Flashback arrestors should have all threads examined for damage or contaminants as well as the joints being tested at working pressure for leak tightness. They should also be tested annually to ensure they are still operating as designed by checking for leak tightness, non return and flow cut off function. Code of Practice 7 “Guidance on Maintenance” recommends that Flashback Arrestors are replaced after 5 years in service US standards as follows:OSHA and ANSI Z49.1 2012* require that each and every flashback arrestor and check valve be tested and maintained according to the manufacturer's instructions. Testing is usually required once per year, or more often in heavy duty or abusive applications. Failure to perform testing can result personal injury accidents, equipment damage, and heavy OSHA violations and fines.
johnmurray  
#3 Posted : 27 June 2014 14:41:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

If you wish to throw money down the drain by having the devices tested, or by purchasing "testers", go ahead. It is almost certainly cheaper to replace them!
johnmurray  
#4 Posted : 27 June 2014 14:49:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

In any case, are you sure it was a flashback arrester, or a non-return valve? !
SHV  
#5 Posted : 14 July 2014 07:39:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SHV

This NZ standards.. However replacement is better option http://digitalweld.co.nz...20Arrestor%20Testing.pdf SHV
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.