Rank: Forum user
|
I am experiencing a bit of an headache with our Client (local authority council) and the Control of Asbestos at work regulation requirements.
Our engineers are contracted to carry out servicing of the council's housing stock for gas. We also are required to do remedial works and breakdowns.
The council's asbestos management company wants to put in place the requirement for R&D surveys to be carried out before any intrusive work is carried out for all work, e.g. if floorboards need to be lifted, or a screw fitted to a wall a survey needs to be done first. (How this would work in an emergency breakdown I don't know).
The previous asbestos company were doing management surveys that were uploaded to a web based programme that located any ACM's. All our engineers are asbestos awareness trained and our policy is that if any ACM's or engineer presumed ACM's are found, they are not to be touched.
Engineers have to check chimneys when servicing gas fires. The council under the direction of their asbestos consultants want us to check the chimneys wearing respirators etc. This would scare the tenants half to death especially with 'asbestos' being mentioned!
What are other people's experience of asbestos management in domestic premises (Reg 4 of the CAW doesn't apply) with regard surveys etc?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Acts,
I worked in exactly the same situation. 20,000 council house to look after. Covering every conceivable repair from a whole new roof to minor everyday issues.
The company in question had an ongoing relationship with a Licensed Asbestos contractor but they only had accurate asbestos records for about 10-15% of the houses.
What they had decided to do, as they gained more detailed info on each individual house, (estimated to take 20 years) was to extrapolate on house type, construction date and original construction company in an attempt to assess which houses were likely to have Asbestos issue. i.e. House "A". has been worked on before and was know to have asbestos in the xxxx ...whatever, therefore they assumed that every other house of that type, built by the same company at the same time was highly likely to have the same issue. Houses of the same type built by the same company a few years either side may well also have that issue. House of a different type but built by the same company around the same time may have similar issues as well. And so.
The slight drawback was that many older houses have been repaired over the years and those repairs may well have involved installing new asbestos.
However, this was the best solution to the problem they could come up with while, in tandem, trying to catch up with full surveys on as many houses as possible.
They had 200 operatives working on the houses who would obviously report back whenever suspected ACMs were uncovered during works -- this was then fed back in to the system and similar house investigated to try and continually improve the accuracy of the predictions.
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You say you are recommended to wear respirators when checking the chimneys and that would scare the tenants "half to death"
Better to have them half dead than your employees fully dead ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
FireSafety101 wrote:You say you are recommended to wear respirators when checking the chimneys and that would scare the tenants "half to death"
Better to have them half dead than your employees fully dead ?
Absolute rubbish and another knee jerk reaction when the word asbestos is mentioned.
Point 1. If it is just a visual check then there is no need whatsoever for the operatives to wear respirators as nothing is being disturbed.
Point 2. If there is a requirement for the person doing the check to wear a respirator then surely the resident and all their family should be issued with respirators too because we all know the dangers of fibre spread.
Point 3. If they are that concerened about the possibility of asbestos then they could check the chimney using cctv.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Asbestos within domestic dwellings is always a difficult issue, in part, due to the lack of regulations and also clarity within HSE guidance. There are many different angles which one could provide an opinion, however it is really a case of picking through the issues to find the best fit for any given situation.
I don't know why the LA asbestos adviser is telling the sub-contractor what PPE to wear? Surely that's down to those carrying out the work.
The Client (LA) should be providing pre-construction information which includes inherent hazards such as ACMs. Whether a R&D survey should be carried out depends on the actual work, but in the absence of one a management survey should be undertaken to assess the whereabouts of ACMs. Failing that, it is acceptable to complete a sampling strategy of dwellings if there is a large number of tenanted dwelling involved as follows:
original construction information;
building material specifications;
subsequent refurbishment or building works;
previous asbestos surveys or removals; and
information generated during the survey process itself that may necessitate revision of the original planning assumptions.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A local housing association has a renovation project running. It has been running for over a year now. An asbestos survey has [just] been contracted for. What a surprise, asbestos was "discovered" in the artex, and in the floor tile adhesive, and in the cupboard and airing cupboard ceilings (airing cupboard was brown asbestos). Given that they have just FINISHED installing new heating systems, which included putting flues through the white asbestos sheet tops (without any employee protection methods), they seem to be having second thoughts about stabilising and sealing the outside structures ceilings (white asbestos cement).
I pointed out to them the problems of removing AC soffits, with their employees not having any form of clothing/self cleansing facilities onsite, some time ago....
It seems that education, with respect to asbestos, is sadly lacking in many desk-jockeys today.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks all for commenting.
All trades were called to a management meeting last week.
An electrician just kept asking "can I put a screw into a wall" without a R&D survey? Nobody answered his question.
It was interesting how the meeting panned out with the asbestos manager (employed as an external consultant by the LA) went from demanding surveys for all intrusive work at the start of the meeting to using the term 'reasonably practicable' by the end of it (hence the "dust mask" use for inspecting chimneys for us). This stance changed during the meeting as the LA project manager could see the costs involved mounting!
It was also an issue for me is that tenants were left out of the 'loop' where the findings of surveys were known.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Acts 8:37 wrote:Thanks all for commenting.
All trades were called to a management meeting last week.
An electrician just kept asking "can I put a screw into a wall" without a R&D survey? Nobody answered his question.
It was interesting how the meeting panned out with the asbestos manager (employed as an external consultant by the LA) went from demanding surveys for all intrusive work at the start of the meeting to using the term 'reasonably practicable' by the end of it (hence the "dust mask" use for inspecting chimneys for us). This stance changed during the meeting as the LA project manager could see the costs involved mounting!
It was also an issue for me is that tenants were left out of the 'loop' where the findings of surveys were known.
Could I ask why people are using dust masks as protection against inhalation of asbestos fibres. This is not suitable.
As stated previously if its just a visual check then no asbestos is being disturbed and no ppe is neccessary.
If PPE is going to be used at least use some that is going to work.
In answer to your electricians question. Yes he can put a screw in the wall without an R&D survey provided he assumes asbestos is present and takes the neccessary precautions as per HSE asbestos essentials task sheets.
If you want my opinion get some people who know what they are talking about on the project.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Could I ask why people are using dust masks as protection against inhalation of asbestos fibres. This is not suitable.
As stated previously if its just a visual check then no asbestos is being disturbed and no ppe is neccessary.
If PPE is going to be used at least use some that is going to work.
In answer to your electricians question. Yes he can put a screw in the wall without an R&D survey provided he assumes asbestos is present and takes the neccessary precautions as per HSE asbestos essentials task sheets.
If you want my opinion get some people who know what they are talking about on the project.
Yes I agree the "dust mask" was deemed 'reasonably practicable' by the Asbestos Manager.
The asbestos essentials route is what I have advised my MD to follow (there are insurance complications in doing this with 'asbestos working' I am informed). All engineers are asbestos awareness trained, if that training indicates presumed ACM's the procedure is stop work and report. We will have to jump through the "dust mask" requirement (the asbestos manager using the term "dust mask" had me biting my tongue in the meeting).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
paulw71 wrote:Acts 8:37 wrote:Thanks all for commenting.
All trades were called to a management meeting last week.
An electrician just kept asking "can I put a screw into a wall" without a R&D survey? Nobody answered his question.
It was interesting how the meeting panned out with the asbestos manager (employed as an external consultant by the LA) went from demanding surveys for all intrusive work at the start of the meeting to using the term 'reasonably practicable' by the end of it (hence the "dust mask" use for inspecting chimneys for us). This stance changed during the meeting as the LA project manager could see the costs involved mounting!
It was also an issue for me is that tenants were left out of the 'loop' where the findings of surveys were known.
Could I ask why people are using dust masks as protection against inhalation of asbestos fibres. This is not suitable.
As stated previously if its just a visual check then no asbestos is being disturbed and no ppe is neccessary.
If PPE is going to be used at least use some that is going to work.
In answer to your electricians question. Yes he can put a screw in the wall without an R&D survey provided he assumes asbestos is present and takes the neccessary precautions as per HSE asbestos essentials task sheets.
If you want my opinion get some people who know what they are talking about on the project.
The position of the asbestos manager is that behind every chimney are airborne asbestos fibres!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Madness. I seriously doubt the asbestos managers ability.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
paulw71 wrote:Madness. I seriously doubt the asbestos managers ability.
I agree but sometimes we have to bite our tongues don't we!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Acts 8:37 wrote:paulw71 wrote:Madness. I seriously doubt the asbestos managers ability.
I agree but sometimes we have to bite our tongues don't we!!!!
Suppose so. Unfortunatley.
I have had similair experiences with clients so called H&S managers. On one occasion a Gentleman even sent a circular email out asking why the contractor wasnt complying with the "safe use and erection of scaffolding regulations".
I didnt recall ever hearing of such a thing, but he had kindly attached a copy. It was a set of New Zealand Regs.
How do these people get on ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
paulw71 wrote:Acts 8:37 wrote:paulw71 wrote:Madness. I seriously doubt the asbestos managers ability.
I agree but sometimes we have to bite our tongues don't we!!!!
Suppose so. Unfortunatley.
I have had similair experiences with clients so called H&S managers. On one occasion a Gentleman even sent a circular email out asking why the contractor wasnt complying with the "safe use and erection of scaffolding regulations".
I didnt recall ever hearing of such a thing, but he had kindly attached a copy. It was a set of New Zealand Regs.
How do these people get on ?
The asbestos manager I was discussing carries out asbestos surveys for us (under the LA's direction, conflict of interests all over the shop). I sent out a sub contractor evaluation pack and was expecting to see documented proof of what quality system they use, their risk assessments and plans of work etc (as detailed in the Survey Guide). It came back basically blank. In the section titled 'Health and Safety Competence/Advisor' the company's competent person was the HSE. How do people get these positions!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.