Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Invictus  
#1 Posted : 21 November 2014 08:29:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Has anyone else been advised to X2 the HAV magnitude of hand tools to get the true Magnitude. We have been advised by the HSE to do this after changing all our tools. I have read the EU good practice guide to HAV that recommends this practice. I thought test under the ISO would be sufficient for the magnitude according to the manufacturers guidance. Although I am aware that the test is carried out under test conditions and not in normal use.
stuie  
#2 Posted : 21 November 2014 12:18:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

Hi Invictus, I seem to recall this was the case but according to a senior HSE officer last week this is not now the case. 'Manufacturers have now improved the way that they measure and record the vibration levels so the data is more accurate than it used to be' was the general message that I took away from the seminar last week. At the risk of teaching granny to suck eggs; you need to measure the actual usage/dose that the ops are exposed to - each individual will be different in the way they hold/grip/use/force applied etc and as such will be exposed to differing levels of vibration. IMHO it is not enough to just rely on manufacturers data; by all means use it as a tool to give you a hit list of the 'at risk tools/people/operations' but don't rely on it. As tools get used they deteriorate and wear thus increasing the vibration levels etc. Sorry if this is something you already know. Cheers Stuart
bluefingers  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2015 19:06:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

Invictus I have just completed a review of HAVS in our organisation and am happy to share my findings. We use angle grinders for dressing fabricated units, and we have approximately 50 workers using angle grinders all day. I made a list of all the different types of angle grinders and put the manufacturers figures onto a spreadsheet, for both soft pad and hard disc. Next I joined an organisation called HAVTEC, which tests vibratory tools. I put their figures into the spreadsheet for comparism. Next I hired a Castle vibration monitor and measured the vibration levels of the different grinders, calculated the vector sums and put these readings into the spreadsheet. I found that both my measurements, and those of HAVTECs were within 10% of the manufacturers data, something which could have been caused by wear and tear on the grinders. The organisation has gone on to buy some HAVI monitors which record the trigger time in points like the HSE calculator. Hope this helps.
Waz  
#4 Posted : 12 January 2015 12:05:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Waz

Invictus A great topic, and as you know, vibration is measured in m/s2 (or acceleration to most). Now the key thing, and a great place to start is addressing 'trigger times' for your exposed personnel. Many personnel believe they are grinding all day (8 hours) but consideration is the time spent on the 'trigger' - which can be minutes rather than hours. Time motion studies are good, or you can get 'Castle' monitors for this (others have indicated this). That is the simplified aspect to be honest. You can then use the 'time' measurements for your HSE calculator and obtain the measurements of HAV from the manufacturer's technical sheets for the tooling. This is then entered, and I do a 20% worst/best case scenario, above and below the quoted level. This then allows for deterioration over time.
descarte8  
#5 Posted : 13 January 2015 14:40:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
descarte8

To answer the original question, this used to be the case when the old ISO allowed tools to be tested by the manufacturer running in free air rather than in actual use....(under-estimation). The new standard is a lot more realistic, and the HSE's advice has been updated (badly) to reflect this (if they read their own advice): http://www.hse.gov.uk/vi...tion/hav/regulations.htm "" Please be aware: Please refer to page 6, 'Estimating exposure,' second paragraph - "However, if the only information available to you is the vibration emission declared in the equipment’s handbook, it may be safer to double this figure before using it for estimating daily exposures." - Due to the implementation (29/12/2009) of the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008, supplementary European Standards have been revised to help manufacturers provide information that can be used to estimate daily HAV exposure - see Estimating Exposure. "" So realistically it will depend on the age of the measurements you have and how they were taken - the standard used may be available in the manufacturers guidance. Des
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.