Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
JohnW  
#1 Posted : 05 December 2014 11:10:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Something drastic needs to happen in the construction industry to stop builders and contractors doing this. http://press.hse.gov.uk/...d-after-roof-fall-death/
walker  
#2 Posted : 05 December 2014 12:16:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Whilst contracts are won by whoever submits the lowest quote nothing changes. HSE have given up on prevention and spend time shutting stable doors
Nimble057  
#3 Posted : 05 December 2014 12:37:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nimble057

I don't know if anyone else is having the same experience; but in the last 12 months I'm noticing a HUGE decline in standards demanded by the big principal contractors within the construction fields. The level of knowledge at site level among the project management teams these days is appalling; feels like going back to the early 90's. The HSE needs to start blitzing sites - the industry sure as hell isn't moving forward
Ian Bell  
#4 Posted : 05 December 2014 12:44:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell

The construction industry are equivalent to the infantry in the army - canon fodder. If someone dies, just get someone else - there are plenty more guys available in this race to the bottom economy we have. Safety - no thanks - far too expensive. As others have said - the HSE have given up.
Mebo  
#5 Posted : 05 December 2014 13:00:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mebo

The government regard health and safety as needless red tape. I think the HSE are concerned only with their own survival now.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#6 Posted : 05 December 2014 13:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

This is interesting: 'The company’s director, Lee Cotterill, who had no formal qualifications as a scaffolder, had overall control of the design, planning and construction of the edge protection and personally signed it off as being safe'. Something wrong here and I just cannot put my finger on it... but if Cotterill had overall control of the design etc. I'm sure someone (Himself?) thought he was competent to hold the position. Experience yes, but augmented by proven qualifications to hold such a position surely?. A person can go through a lifetime doing things wrong and getting away with it.. but sooner of later, someone picks up the tab. If you are not shown the correct way to do things how do you know if you're right? Monkey see, monkey do. How can you sign something off as being safe when you don't have a clue... No doubt I'm wrong in my view but is just my opinion.
chris42  
#7 Posted : 05 December 2014 13:28:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

The Director was sentenced to three months in prison, suspended for 12 months, and ordered to pay costs of £4,000. Not enough, by a long way also One of the directors had never heard of the regulations the company should have been working to. This was a development company !!! I would like to say unbelievable, but it does not feel like it is. It seems that there is a constant stream of very similar incidents. Perhaps it should be compulsory for directors to go on a proper H&S course (not that half day thing). Chris
Lawlee45239  
#8 Posted : 05 December 2014 14:15:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Nimble057 wrote:
I don't know if anyone else is having the same experience; but in the last 12 months I'm noticing a HUGE decline in standards demanded by the big principal contractors within the construction fields. The level of knowledge at site level among the project management teams these days is appalling; feels like going back to the early 90's. The HSE needs to start blitzing sites - the industry sure as hell isn't moving forward
R.I.P to that poor man, and bless his family. PC's no a days are management companies in my view, they have no clue about construction, and care less about it too. One PC we are working with at present is run by agency guys, sho do not even know the PC systems..... Its annoying. But the ethos at present seems to be build it fast and build it cheap, and unless that is changed then the construction industry wont.
BJC  
#9 Posted : 06 December 2014 10:35:35(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

The HSE answer is to abolish CDM Coordinators therein lies the level of understanding of those in enforcement.
johnmurray  
#10 Posted : 06 December 2014 10:55:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

firesafety101  
#11 Posted : 06 December 2014 11:41:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

BJC wrote:
The HSE answer is to abolish CDM Coordinators therein lies the level of understanding of those in enforcement.
So the CDM Coordinator gets the blame again, only there wasn't one on this occasion?
RayRapp  
#12 Posted : 06 December 2014 12:31:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Despite all the regulations and duties on clients, designers, PC, etc these type of incidents are still all too common. Why? Organisations only get caught and prosecuted for non-compliance following a serious incident - save for the rare exception. The reality, however, is non-compliance is ubiquitous. Even when organisations and individuals are found guilty the sanctions are frugally pathetic. If the law is to be effective there must be realistic chance of getting caught and the penalty sufficient to act as a deterrent to others. Clearly that is not the case.
bob youel  
#13 Posted : 06 December 2014 13:03:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

As people are cheap and the fines etc. under HSWA 74 especially are pitiful the only way now is for the family to get direct help and support and they should personally sue the director, managers etc. and the business* even though it will take a long time and not together in the same action but individually in separate actions e.g. divide the parties & conquer! And somebody who is competent [people can put me forward if they want] for no cost needs to be helping the family [*The business will probably go bankrupt to avoid further actions against it in any case and then start again -under a new name- the following Monday as is common practice]
paul.skyrme  
#14 Posted : 06 December 2014 20:52:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

To coin a phrase from somewhere else... "its all about MONEY, not SAFETY". It will always be until safety it put first, which it will never be, people are expendable and cheap in the grand scheme of things. That is where the problem lies. Companies see this as being true, and with the levels of enforcement in place, it really is true. However, these expendable people are not expendable to their family, friends, themselves etc. How can they be? Why should they be? Until companies are prepared to pay the price for work to be done with the correct levels of H&S, and NOT done by the lowest bidder, in a drive to the bottom, how can this change? To me there is a totally different mindset in construction and manufacturing. Construction, in out, cheap as possible, to heck with quality or safety if they can get away with it. Quality only matters if it gets spotted, or causes a problem, and the volumes are really so low, often one off, it is rarely an issue to put right. Now in manufacturing, if you make a faulty product, you could end up making millions before you realise. If you have a H&S breach, then you are likely to be doing the same thing for months if not years, so you have to get it right. If, you can save money on a manufacturing process without compromising quality or safety, then you could potentially save, a LOT of money over many years. In construction individual tasks don't go on for years. It is IMHO a philosophical issue that will not change until mind sets change. The primary driver being again IMHO, what is perceived as value. The old saying, "pay peanuts, get monkeys" IMHO still applies today...
edwill7  
#15 Posted : 08 December 2014 16:19:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
edwill7

I am recently out of construction (in wine of all things). I miss the industry (as was) but in the past 5 years it was like going back twenty years. Price is everything, PC's are paying nothing, so subbies are pushed to the limit. Manpower has been hammered and there has been a recent acceptance of whatever gets the job done, gets the job done. Labour is only quantified by time so the quicker you work the quicker you work elsewhere. Subbies are having to manage themsleves and other trades. I worked on a £35M new build school, which had other 250 workers (15 or so trades) and 1 full time site manager and 2 freelance site supervisors. How can that be right? Who is checking anything? And I mean anything?
chris42  
#16 Posted : 08 December 2014 17:22:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

So as per the title "how can we stop this sort of thing" What exactly needs to happen ? 1) Harsher punishment for directors ? 2) Better ways of selecting on sub contractor safety competence than pre qualification currently allows? 3) Some further Government control (but what) ? 4) Better enforcement by HSE (more inspections) 5) Us, in some way reporting anything and everything we see around us better ? In the report I read that they had not told the HSE under CDM. However when I go about and see buildings etc being built, there is not say an online directory of what has been reported to HSE. So I could not check and report them if they had not. Would it take a programmer long to build such a list by address (I may be wrong as I don't do this but you do fill out an online form for F10 don't you -so the info is there). I can't help but think and easy reporting system to HSE is the way forward. Then them moving quickly to the reported issue to catch them before the accident occurs. Just MHO, we can't just continue to whinge about they way it currently is. Chris
RayRapp  
#17 Posted : 09 December 2014 08:11:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

The HSE can catch as many non-compliant works as they wish to choose. If you look at the HSE construction blitz over the years there have been hundreds of ENs served, but rarely a prosecution - what sort of message does this send out? Only a couple of weeks ago I was out with 'er indoors walking through Leicester Square, where scaffolders were dismantling a scaffold to a shop front. Not a stitch of PPE, no signage or segregation of the work. Meanwhile, a scaffolder was dropping boards from the first lift to a colleague below whilst customers were walking right next to him in and out of the shop!
garryw1509  
#18 Posted : 09 December 2014 09:48:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
garryw1509

http://www.constructione...jailed-for-manslaughter/ Can only concur with other posts observing standards are falling; and although I doubt harsher judgements will change this, I welcome it. My take is that perception of risk is at the lowest ebb ever with documentation and PQQs the main pre cursor for major contractors as opposed to establishing competence, experience and if the right foot fits the right shoe. We have also done procedures and policy to death without ever really addressing the human factors and behaviours with any sort of conviction and fall into the usual findings and controls. Accident happens = Toolbox talk / training. Violation on site = Toolbox talk / training. Unsafe behaviour = Toolbox talk / training. Its not just about cost and price, the big boys get it wrong too you know!...I think we have just bottomed out and its all a bit tired, and too many people in all disciplines of the industry, don't know what they don't know. Until firms of all shapes and sizes realise its down to a mix of competence and behaviours then we will continue to stagnate or worse, go backwards.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.