Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Lojikglos  
#1 Posted : 21 January 2015 09:35:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lojikglos

Morning Troops I have put together a Care Plan for an employee who through consultation has indicated that if symptoms of High Blood sugar levels manifest there may be an instance , (if first immediate action - fresh air and brisk walking do not reduce symptoms) then medication may be required injecting (with injection pen variant) Calling on members here to offer guidance or there experience with similar in there place of employment I have requested some kind of written confirmation through employees GP that he would be happy / agree from a duty of care approach that injections are agreed course of action. Secondly although this employee has never experienced a diabetic incident of High blood sugar where does the employer stand legally as employee has indicated that IF the Immediate actions are not carried out correctly then there could be a chance of said employee going into Diabetic comma. Finally I seem to remember a change in legislation regarding First Aiders offering first aid, as in they can not be held culpable for administering first aid. Naturally I am only at first stage of this and once care plan is finalised it will then be briefed to all first aiders. I am expecting some resistance here as well as first aiders may refuse to carry out the injection if the need ever arose. thanks in advance who offer advice.
Jane Blunt  
#2 Posted : 21 January 2015 09:55:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

I was taught that it is the low blood sugar scenario that is the more dangerous and the more likely. the person will probably be self medicating and monitoring their blood sugar quite carefully. If they fail to eat at the right time, having taken their insulin, their blood sugar can plummet. See the advice here: http://www.stjohn.org.nz...st-Aid-Library/Diabetes/ You may need to revisit this one. First Aiders do not give injections.
CdC  
#3 Posted : 21 January 2015 10:03:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CdC

It is low blood sugar you need to be concerned about, as the individual can very quickly loose consciousness and be unable to help themselves, as Jane put above. It takes a lot longer for high blood sugar levels to cause an individual to loose consciousness, where a first aider would be needed. But even then, a first aider would not give injections. In a hyperglycaemic episode the individual will be able to help themselves through fasting & exercise.
A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 21 January 2015 10:27:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

The law on first is and always has been: a first aider can help someone to the best of their abilities. If they are not trained to give insulin injections and not trained to recognise diabetes, then there is no expectation on them or their employer to do anything. There is no ‘good Samaritan law ‘in the UK ie no general expectation or obligation that you have to provide assistance such as first aid to anybody else. The situation is different for a fully qualified medical person such as a doctor or a nurse but first aiders are not classed as medically qualified. A person might be sued if they carried out a procedure for which they had no training and they would not be expected to carry out such as giving insulin shot in a reckless or negligent manner. They might also be prosecuted for assault if the person was unconscious and the person did not give person for the injection. But if they did something to the best of their abilities there should be no issues. Case law on this is very thin as this looks like one of those theoretical issues that has never cropped up ie I have never heard of a first aider being sued.
Lojikglos  
#5 Posted : 21 January 2015 15:07:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lojikglos

THANK YOU FOR RESPONESE TEAM (CAPS TO HIGHLIGHT GRATITUDE) Thanks also to IOSH for setting this forum up . . .I could have been in a world of pain as well as said employee Worrying thing is this care plan was drawn up through consultation with employee .. . . Thanks again guys
toe  
#6 Posted : 21 January 2015 22:35:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

I too have never heard of a first aider being sued in the UK. If they are doing as they have been trained and do not go out-with that training they should be OK legally. As first aid training course are not now controlled by the HSE, quite often administering autopens or insulin pens is quite common training in the full 3 day training course, if it is not and you need your staff to be trained just ask them to add it in, they will need to have the training pens though carry this out. It is correct that first aiders do not administer injections, however, they can give emergency rescue medication (IM) if trained. We tell our staff to put the persons hand/thumb over the pen when pushing down the plunger - this will give the person the opportunity to resist if the so wish it not to be given. Just what we do and not necessary everyone viewpoint.
stevedm  
#7 Posted : 25 January 2015 10:36:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

It is right that first aiders are covered by 'angel of mercy' in the law, however I wouldn't be advising First Aiders to inject anything...despite training..I have attended one FA who lost his thumb because he got the pen the wrong way round! That said I have also trained some more advanced first aiders to put a cannula in so we have IV access before we get on scene in certain cases.. The company however is taking on a very large chunk of liability...what we do is covered by our medical director. Your emergency treatment (For Hypo) should concentrate on non-invasive techniques (Glucose solutions), good diagnosis (BM)(For both Hypo & Hyper) and giving the emergency services a good handover. I don't know the region you work in but unless you are in Wales or Scotland (and some remote regions of England) the response times are fair (so long as there isn't a strike!) so I wouldn't be that worried about... As JB says Hypo is life threatening, Hyper is not that time dependant...so long as there are not any complications... In most cases the PT knows and manages it accordingly. I would be putting more emphasis on PT own control, the signs and symptoms prior for those working with and around the person. Hope this helps...if you need more detail then please let me know...I have completed OH risk assessments which take into account response times...
boblewis  
#8 Posted : 25 January 2015 13:09:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

There really should never be a need for anyone other than the affected person to inject insulin at work. Hypos need sugar/glucose sweets/dinks as a treatment NOT an injection of insulin as this will only worsen the situation. If the person has a Hyper then insulin can be administered by the person themselves or by any attending paramedic. Remember insulin users will be carrying their own blood sugar test kit. Hypos are the real danger.
jodieclark1510  
#9 Posted : 25 January 2015 23:39:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

I was trained to help someone with a pen for example prepare it for them but I was not to administer. Personally I wouldn't feel comfortable in doing so. Most of those at work who are diabetic are relatively good at self monitoring and telling us there's a problem, but are always prepped for unforeseen episodes
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.