Rank: Forum user
|
Who thinks we should have an agree / disagree button and the ability to edit our posts?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
We have been asking for those features for over 10 years. to my knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
cough spell cough checker cough cough (shhh whisper it quietly) :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Eadit button. See what I mean.........?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
In answer to the OP - yes. Yes, I do. If there was an 'agree' button on your post, I would've clicked it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A "Like" Button - No A Spill Chucker - Yes
BUT, be careful what you wish for. More functionality on the forum platform will cost more in terms of licensing, managing and all the other ongoing costs associated with IT paraphanalia.
So, all in all, it's a simple platform that does enough to achieve the aim of a forum for discussing safety issues; More cost will either result in membership fees going up or some other member service being cut,
So, lets just leave it as it is,
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jim,
There is a spell checker
Its an edit button we want Would save lots of bad temper and misunderstandings but as I say 10 years+ and counting
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And the ability to attach / upload docs, photos etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Walker,
OK, accepted, there is a spill chucker and you would like a nedit button. You don't aknowledge the thrust of my comment re more cost though.
P'raps a comment along the lines of I would like an Edit button and I'm willing to fund it through my membership to the tune of £0:00 per month? Once enough people commit to paying it can be funded?
Or, p'raps instead of funding it ourselves, or seeing a reduction in other services, the platform should become self funding by allowing advertising to polute the margins etc?
Just sayin'
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Dex Pees - write on.
I two want anerd hit button.
Or would this constitute violation of forum rules?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
To be able to respond directly to a comment, underneath it rather than having to add a new comment at the end of the thread.
Help with continuity of a thread instead of other side tracked/irrelevant points in a discussion.
If you look at most newspaper comments sections, they work this way.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Steve Granger wrote:Dex Pees - write on.
I two want anerd hit button.
Or would this constitute violation of forum rules? I always thought that general perception was we are all nerds on here, and as such we are allowed to beat ourselves up as much as we like about what have / should have done. I guess the counter argument would be we check what we write before we post and we are a little forgiving for the odd typo. Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jim,
If you are concerned about where your membership fees are being spent I'd urge you to check out the CEOs salary. Its buried in the accounts they send us, but hope we do not read. I predict this post will not last the afternoon ;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
walker wrote:Jim,
If you are concerned about where your membership fees are being spent I'd urge you to check out the CEOs salary. Its buried in the accounts they send us, but hope we do not read. I predict this post will not last the afternoon ;-) Entertaining, informative and witty, all in one post. I think this is the way forward. Maybe a scorecard button for each post. This one gets 10/10 for all three categories. I am willing to increase my membership by £0.001 per annum to fund this upgrade ;-) Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I very much doubt that the renumerrations of IOSH personnel paid above a threshold is delibrately buried in the IOSH accounts. It is a standard format--one can view accounts of other charities on the Charity Commission website and the format is similar.
Also, the CEO renumeration is not excessive. It is comparable to the CEO/equivalent of British Safety Council & RosPA.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jay, I take it your are the IOSH CEO, with that comment?
IOSH a charity? You are having a laugh.... its an old boys club. Funny handshakes etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I don't think an agree or like button is worth it. This isn't facebook and it may encourage laziness (i.e. not posting and therefore not fostering discussion). What happens if you agree with part of a post but not another part of it? All of sudden it becomes redundant.
The matters we discuss on here are not "I had chicken for dinner" (like facebook!) but are the nuances of legislation and law that is designed to protect people and businesses.
Now, an edit function on the other hand...... that's a different sotry.... I'll take 2! ;)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Its not Friday but.........
Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.
Eye strike a key and type a word
And weight four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.
As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its rarely ever wrong.
Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect in it's weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
What makes you think this isn’t like facebook? Read most of the remarks off thread and most just daft. A while back someone asked a question and then questioned why he only got one reply his answer was the reply was correct and there was no agree button to hit for others.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
So what stopped anyone posting something like, "I agree with JoeBloggs".
Having a disagree button will not foster discussion at all. People will click it and you get no discussion. The point of this forum can be to find best practice and that will come from people having differing opinions. I think anything that may reduce or remove the chance of someone sharing their opinion should not be used, simple!
I really don't see the need for the facebook-esque agree/disagree like/dislike options, but that is my opinion and of course others will differ.
And this really isn't like facebook.... If your suggesting that you ask for advice on H&S related information and interpretation of laws to your facebook mates then aside from barking up the wrong tree I think your friends list may begin to shrink just a little bit!!!
I jest (sort of...) but I really think that this forum serves a very different service to being able to like your mates status'!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have already posted my comments on the members' forum. However as there are now two threads the same:
I would like to agree, but feel I must disagree. The reason why I disagree is twofold, first, it could lead to negativity or worse if someone simply hit a disagree button without any comment. Furthermore, it could stifle debate. There are many grey areas in our industry and very few black and white.
I have no objection to a 'like' button, smiley avatar or something similar.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If you have an edit button and use it to correct typos etc ok, but what if you completely change the post. Would that not make the following posts read out of context. Making those posters potentially look stupid ?
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Chris42 wrote:................what if you completely change the post. Would that not make the following posts read out of context. Making those posters potentially look stupid ?
Chris Totally agree - this happened on another site that I use - nearly killed off the forums, as confusion reigned when the meaning of old postings were totally changed The answer possibly is an edit facility that is limited to [say] 5 or 10 minutes after the posting was made
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.