Rank: Forum user
|
We currently carry out health surveillance in relation to exposures to noise, vibration and general hazardous substances (nothing high risk like asbestos or lead) but don't actually record this on a health record like we should; we simply file the certificates of fitness to work which we receive from our OHP, after they have been actioned where relevant, which I don't believe is enough to meet the requirements of the legislation.
For those amongst us who have responsibility for managing health surveillance in your organisation I was wondering if anyone has a health record template that works that they wouldn't mind sharing?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You may find that your OHP is maintaining sufficient records on your behalf, but you do need to clarify ownership such that you can maintain continuity and legal compliance if you change OHP.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
fscott,
Ron has hit the nail on the head. What you need to do is ensure that you are able to access those records at any point in the future that you may need them (which could be many years from now). If you do at any point end up storing the records yourself, you will need to ensure that you have sufficient data protection security in place to protect what is peoples' sensitive personal data.
Regards.
DJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I maintain the OH contract for my company and it's quite simple once you are on top of things. If you have a good OH supplier behind you it makes the whole difference. I keep a matrix (excel spreadsheet) with names, what tests, times scales etc. If any body comes back requiring additional surveillance or they trip an action level this is recorded in the matrix. The main bulk of the records are held by the OH supplier, it's easier to comply with the data protection act if you don't have to keep large amounts of personal data on site.
I haven't ever had any issues by working in this fashion and if I ever need access to the records they are only a phone call away.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You're still responsible for data protection, even if a third party is contracted to gather-and-store it.
Joint data controllers in fact.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
JohnMurray wrote:You're still responsible for data protection, even if a third party is contracted to gather-and-store it.
Joint data controllers in fact.
Indeed, we interviewed them prior to the contract being signed and also inspected their premises. I am happy that they are compliant. Everything that we keep on-site is kept under lock and key.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks everyone your views are much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.