Rank: Forum user
|
If your company deals with several hundred different substances...how have people found it best to communicate the findings of the COSHH Risk Assessment to the workforce. Or is it a case, of completing all the COSHH Risk Assessments, and implementing all safe guards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Assess the work process rather than each individual substance, usually cuts down the number of assessments required. As an example - spray painting
The base paints are likely to be the same basic substances e.g.toulene/white spirit. No point in assessing red paint, blue paint, green paint etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ian has it right. A chemical is a hazard. The risk only arises when you use it and there is potential for exposure! So you start with the task, then identify what chemicals you are using. Now comes the often difficult part. You need to identify the hazards that exist when you use the chemical as the way in which it is being used may well change the properties of the chemical(s) and therefore the hazard. (The safety data sheet will usually not tell you about this.) Then check what exposure is occurring (or could occur) and attempt to assess what risk this poses in terms of causing damage to health.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
At the risk of repeating what others have/will say here’s my twopennath. There seems to be a consensus however which is always reassuring especially when Chris Packham is part of it.
In my area we collected about 500 different safety data sheets before we stopped. The controls for these fell into a couple of categories mostly because of the small or tiny volumes we are using.
So now I don’t do COSHH assessments I do task assessments and if the task uses a chemical I put the necessary controls in place to manage the risk associated with that task in light of the risks associated with the chemical(s) used, the amount used, its concentration, formulation.
So now we control the task rather than the chemical. That way you’re able to cover all the hazards associated with the use of a large number of chemicals without useless, valueless mountains of paper that no one will ever look at.
Hope this helps.
Graham
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Good comment by Graham. I wish more people did it that way.
In terms of communicating the risk assessment to the workforce I would seriously consider incorporating this into the actual task procedure/protocol. Health and safety should not, in my view, be a separate, add-on topic. As my old instructor used to say when I studied electrical engineering: "There is only one way to do it and that will be the safe way!" (And this was long before the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974) As part of the normal procedure you are far more likely to obtain the compliance you need.
Chris
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.