Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is not the first time this has been identified.
I thought it was common knowledge it was rife
You have to be pretty dim to need help with that.
My attitude is that any orgnisation that puts its faith into CSCS is that they themselves are a bit suspect when it comes to real safety. My box ticking alarm goes off.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I saw the news last night re CSCS. I have little faith in this system as a means of assessing competency/training. I have even less now. Surely the construction industry can come up with something more meaningful?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
RayRapp wrote:I saw the news last night re CSCS. I have little faith in this system as a means of assessing competency/training. I have even less now. Surely the construction industry can come up with something more meaningful?
You assume the industry want something better, I'm more cynical.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Walker, you are cynical...but not wrong either.
I have said before CSCS is a cheap and lazy way for employers to discharge their duties by providing so-called training. Even the good old HSE are now distancing themselves from this process.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Been going on for years - even cutting out the 'middle man' with counterfeit cards as long as 4 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Victor Meldrew wrote:Been going on for years - even cutting out the 'middle man' with counterfeit cards as long as 4 years ago.
a nice irony that the scammers are being scammed
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A comment by the HSE. Interesting to note - “No card provides complete evidence of competence and additional enquiries and/or supervision are normally needed. Cards alone cannot be relied upon as a measure of competence and should not be used as a ‘passport’ onto a construction site.”
Bolted and stable door springs to mind.
http://www.shponline.co....expose/?cid=homepage_3rd
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It was naive of BBC to portray that the test is the significant aspect of the CSCS Card. We all know that the test is an extremely generic one and does not replace Site Specific Health & Safety Induction. The significant aspect of the CSCS Card is the "Trade Skills" aspect.
It is up to the scheme owners to the call on the Health & Safety Test--My preference is for a one day basic--Level 1 Health and Safety Training Attendance
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jay wrote:It was naive of BBC to portray that the test is the significant aspect of the CSCS Card. We all know that the test is an extremely generic one and does not replace Site Specific Health & Safety Induction. The significant aspect of the CSCS Card is the "Trade Skills" aspect.
It is up to the scheme owners to the call on the Health & Safety Test--My preference is for a one day basic--Level 1 Health and Safety Training Attendance
...............with a requirement that all CMIOSH and CFIOSH practitioners also attend this training!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
From memory, I don't think CSCS even recognise CMIOSH as a qualification of competence in exemptions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
tigers wrote:From memory, I don't think CSCS even recognise CMIOSH as a qualification of competence in exemptions.
That is correct, hence my comment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No, it should not be a requirement for those who can demonstrate Health & Safety awareness by other means. The level one day could be made a requirement for those who do not have health & safety module as an integral aspect of their other trade/professional skills qualification/certification/membership.level
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The CSCS card has in my memory been forged ever since its inception. If you create a ticket to a job then people will create a forgery market. The old corgi register was even heavily hacked in the end with forged cards being added to the real register by the hackers. CSCS is no different in my view.
The bone about IOSH qualifications and membership and CSCS will I fear never be ended as long as the originators of CSCS still get money for old rope. IOSH were far to soft and almost cap in hand in their attitudes towards CITB etc in the infant days of this card and failed to recognise the problems that were bound to arise.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi I've taken countless exams/tests graduate, postgraduate, IOSH etc etc and CSCS. For me CSCS appeared to have the most rigorous vetting procedure for exam candidates it was as difficult as getting an actual passport but I guess its not just CSCS cards that are hacked all exam/certificates are including IOSH.
Regards
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
SteveDClarke wrote:Hi I've taken countless exams/tests graduate, postgraduate, IOSH etc etc and CSCS. For me CSCS appeared to have the most rigorous vetting procedure for exam candidates it was as difficult as getting an actual passport but I guess its not just CSCS cards that are hacked all exam/certificates are including IOSH.
Regards
Steve
I (and IOSH HQ) would be interested in any evidence of IOSH exams / certificates being hacked or forged.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
....and nine of the UK’s top 10 biggest construction companies demand them before workers can enter a site.
THIS is where the problem lies.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Totally agree the industry has some major cultural issues that it simply does not want to address as long as it can get away with a ticked box
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.