Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error
Fine for not protecting bearded workers
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
johnmurray  
#1 Posted : 22 November 2015 08:58:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray
Back to top
Bigmac1  
#2 Posted : 22 November 2015 18:33:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bigmac1
Sound totally reasonable to me
Back to top
walker  
#3 Posted : 23 November 2015 07:39:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker
Bigmac1 wrote:
Sound totally reasonable to me
+1
Back to top
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 23 November 2015 13:13:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter
Paltry fine.
Back to top
descarte8  
#5 Posted : 23 November 2015 15:57:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
descarte8
The only wrong here is that the size of the fine is way too small..... Exposure to carcinogens, HAVs cases, no health surveilance for 6 years.... The paltry fine ^ was probably significantly less than the savings they made by not protecting their employees and not providing them with suitable health surveilance. Whats the lesson here?
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET