Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Wade27093  
#1 Posted : 16 December 2015 16:22:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Wade27093

Hi all, Unusual query. A company I work for make 'powder transfer containment valves' for the pharmaceutical industry. They occasionally take used, faulty equipment back from customers which have, in the past, been received with traces of unknown substances within the valves. To try and prevent this they are tightening up their returns procedures and they have recently put together a 'Decontamination Statement' for customers who wish to return these valves. When these statements are returned and state that hazardous substances (e.g. methylene chloride) have been used within the valves, the intention is to have them professionally cleaned by a specialist provider. Two things. Does anyone have any similar experience and can offer a view, please. Also, does anyone know of a company who could professionally decontaminate such equipment? Cheers, Tony
imwaldra  
#2 Posted : 17 December 2015 09:19:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
imwaldra

I think you are doing the right thing. In 1970s, when I worked in the chemical industry, we had some central workshops where sometimes plant equipment was sent for dismantling and overhaul. Preferably it was decontaminated before leaving the plant but sometimes that's not 100% possible, as you've recognised. We used standard paperwork for the plant to complete, which was then fixed to the item - so there was minimal opportunity for the message not to reach the persons potentially at risk. One thing you could consider is that the originators probably know more about how best to dispose of the specific substances, so include a section for them to provide details. That should help to avoid going 'over the top' because the substance hazards are not well known to the decontaminators?
Wade27093  
#3 Posted : 17 December 2015 10:33:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Wade27093

Thanks imwaldra. I appreciate your comments. The problem is mainly in relation to the concern that equipment is being returned having had hazardous substances within in the past. We're jut trying to look at a sensible solution for dealing with and handling these returned items.
A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 17 December 2015 12:24:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Can't the customers decontaminate I themselves before they send it back. After all they should know what it contains and they should be familiar with how to decontaminate it.
Wade27093  
#5 Posted : 17 December 2015 13:33:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Wade27093

We are asking the customers to decontaminate before sending them back but we're not entirely happy that this is being done satisfactorily. We have had instances in the past when returns have been opened and unknown dusts have been present within.
Wade27093  
#6 Posted : 23 December 2015 09:40:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Wade27093

merry christmas one and all :)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.