Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RayRapp  
#1 Posted : 22 December 2015 09:12:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

A quickie for you fire safety bods, what in practice does the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (England) Regulations 2015 have for rented or short term lease properties for Local Authority tenants? In other words, what duty is imposed on the LA to ensure the aforementioned regulations are in place before a property is rented from a private landlord. Many thanks.
mssy  
#2 Posted : 22 December 2015 18:17:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

My understanding is that only private landlords have to comply with these regulations and not providers of social housing (A clause I whole heartedly disagree with as a vulnerable group in society has been excluded). I cannot see why there is any difference when a private landlord's client is a LA or an individual. As long as the landlord is there to show the tenant (in this case the LA) the SDs and CO detection and test it to demonstrate it's working on the first day of the tenancy, then they have complied - haven't they?
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 22 December 2015 19:36:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

mssy Thank for your reply, as I suspected not exactly inundated with responses. I agree, I cannot see why social housing has been excluded from the Act. Are they better than private Landlords...moving on. I accept what you're saying about the practical implications of testing, etc, but really my question is really about the legal duty and possibly the transference of that duty where a LA rents a property from a private tenant. If the CM detector is not in situ will that mean the property is not fit for purpose, or because these are now LA tenants they are exempt anyway? I think is some way I have answered my own question. Assuming the duty cannot be transferred there would only be a moral duty and all that jazz. I might run this past legal for a second opinion.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.