Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Patrick  
#1 Posted : 21 January 2016 09:17:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Patrick

Hi We have a workforce of 300 + with most being transient/ maintenance business. We have upwards of 250 ladders of various types & I'm looking for some ideas on how to manage ladder inspections better. Any ideas? Patrick
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 21 January 2016 10:31:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Patrick I can suggest two ideas. First, an inventory with all ladders and other equipment which includes the date of purchase, service, inspections, etc. A more practical solution is to also tag the ladders with either the date of the last inspection or colour code the tag i.e. orange tag (Oct - March 2016).
grim72  
#3 Posted : 21 January 2016 10:39:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
grim72

Patrick I've sent you a PM with details of our system that might be of interest. Feel free to drop me al ine if you've any questions.
Lawlee45239  
#4 Posted : 21 January 2016 11:04:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Patrick wrote:
Hi We have a workforce of 300 + with most being transient/ maintenance business. We have upwards of 250 ladders of various types & I'm looking for some ideas on how to manage ladder inspections better. Any ideas? Patrick
Tagging the ladders is a good way to issue them all with an ID, and then a designated person can carry out weekly written inspections.
saferay  
#5 Posted : 21 January 2016 16:32:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
saferay

Lawlee45239 Weekly written inspections for 250 ladders? Really? That's 50 a day! Ladder inspection frequencies depend upon how much use they are subjected to, where they are used, how they are transported, where they are stored or after an incident. Weekly inspections are OTT my friend. Assess the potential for damage before deciding upon frequency. I have put a ladder inspection regime in to place for my employer (large Local Authority) and use the following guide to inspection frequency: Daily to once a week use = quarterly inspection Weekly to once a month use = six monthly inspection Monthly or less use = annual inspection I am a Ladder Association Ladder Inspector card holder.
Ron Hunter  
#6 Posted : 21 January 2016 16:37:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Enable the 300+ workforce with the competency and resources to conduct said inspections and monitor and audit that process?
jay  
#7 Posted : 21 January 2016 16:50:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

Refer to HSE Guidance:- http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg455.pdf There is a difference between pre-use checks & formal inspections, the latter requiring recording.
sadlass  
#8 Posted : 21 January 2016 18:20:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sadlass

The leaflet says inspections SHOULD be recorded, not MUST be. Better to empower users and be able to demonstrate that is effective. Parachutists pack their own kit . .
Bigmac1  
#9 Posted : 21 January 2016 20:16:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bigmac1

Should is must
Hally  
#10 Posted : 22 January 2016 09:07:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Pre user checks from the user, it's not hard to do. Then a formal check recorded with the timescale you agree on dependent on use of the ladders.
aud  
#11 Posted : 22 January 2016 18:02:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

Oh-oh. Since when did should = must? Maybe this is why H&S can get in a pickle. I realise this is off the subject but I think it is important. Lets use the Highway Code (an ACOP) to clarify - overtaking is a good example. Rule 163 . . ."You should * not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake * use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick sideways glance if necessary . . . . ." etc etc go read for more. Rule 165: "You MUST NOT overtake * if you would have to cross or straddle double white lines with a solid line nearest to you * if you would have to enter an area designed to divide traffic, if it is surrounded by a solid white line" . . . .and 3 others. MUST (or MUST NOT) rules are backed up by specific legislation which is footnoted whenever these terms are used. SHOULD / OUGHT NOT, DO, DO NOT etc. may be good sense but not specifically regulated. Just a code. In the printed version, these specific MUST / MUST NOT terms are not only in u/c BOLD but also in red too, to distinguish. Not quite so clear online, although the references appear to click on to the regulations. So there is a distinction between MUST and SHOULD. The guidance leaflet referred to is - guidance. Sorry folks - back to ladder checks . . . on which I have little to say.
frankc  
#12 Posted : 23 January 2016 14:48:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
frankc

aud wrote:
Oh-oh. Since when did should = must? Maybe this is why H&S can get in a pickle. I realise this is off the subject but I think it is important. Lets use the Highway Code (an ACOP) to clarify - overtaking is a good example. Rule 163 . . ."You should * not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
How does that affect the laws on tailgating? Is it... a) We SHOULDN'T do it? b) We MUST NOT do it? or c) Both?
aud  
#13 Posted : 24 January 2016 15:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

Frank. Totally baffling comment.
boblewis  
#14 Posted : 24 January 2016 17:50:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

What if we go for you SHALL NOT is that the same as must But still transient workers are there then they are not unlike peripatetic which I think is meant
frankc  
#15 Posted : 24 January 2016 20:29:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
frankc

aud wrote:
Frank. Totally baffling comment.
I'll try again. You said "You should * not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake" Tailgating is getting too close to the vehicle in front. Therefore, is it 'You SHOULD not do it' or 'You MUST not do it' In your opinion, obviously.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.