Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
safetodo01  
#1 Posted : 19 February 2016 13:04:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetodo01

I'm currently looking into our standards for installing personal protection on accessible areas of extreme hot/ cold process pipe work. I'd be interested in links to up date reference material to ensure we are keeping in line with current philosophy.
Ian Bell2  
#2 Posted : 19 February 2016 13:14:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

Before considering PPE to protect people from excessive hot or cold pipework, have you investigated what engineering/physical controls are possible?

Thermal insulation, distance guards (typically wire mesh) fitted around the pipework.

Safety by distance - ie remove the need for people to go near very hot or cold surfaces or re-route pipework?

Process changes (less likely) - but do processes need to be so hot or cold? Energy saving benefit as well.
safetodo01  
#3 Posted : 23 February 2016 08:26:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetodo01

Thanks Ian

Sorry may have mislead, the personal protection I refer is guarding at a distance to prevent contact.
Jim Tassell  
#4 Posted : 23 February 2016 14:31:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jim Tassell

I'm a bit surprised that your process engineers haven't swathed the equipment in lagging. It's more likely to pay for itself than other solutions but failing that treat it a bit like dangerous machinery - fixed guards at a sufficient distance/mesh size to keep people away. Dear old PD5304 will help on this.
Ian Bell2  
#5 Posted : 23 February 2016 15:42:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

Already suggested.

Covering pipes in insulation introduces the risk of CUI - Corrosion under insulation.

So the insulation should be removable to allow for inspections for corrosion.
andybz  
#6 Posted : 23 February 2016 16:13:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
andybz

safetodo01
Your question was clear enough. I guess the lack of an answer suggests that there may not be widely accepted standards or guidelines.

From what I can gather, the requirements are purely to do what has to be done to prevent people contacting surfaces that are above or below the temperatures that can cause harm to the skin. Perfectly logical, but I think you probably understood that.

I have looked as a company standard I have access to. It refers to momentary and prolonged contact. For low temperatures the requirement is to prevent contact to anything below 0C for both situations. For high temperatures the limits are 65C for momentary and 49C for prolonged.

Not sure how helpful that is. However, as stated lagging introduces other risks and so needs to be considered carefully.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.