Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
pato1969  
#1 Posted : 04 April 2016 14:51:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pato1969

We have been checking noise levels of some new machinery , to find one particular machine reads regularly over 90db , this is only used to cut cloth material and is actually a very quite machine , however due to the Sonic cutter on it , the noise level meter reads over 90db , yet no one can actually hear the noise from it due to the pitch of the noise ( similar to a dog whistle I suppose , being out of the normal hearing range)

So my question is , although we can not physically hear the noise , but it is registered on a noise reader , would we have to enforce hearing defenders due to the high reading.
Alfasev  
#2 Posted : 04 April 2016 15:00:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev

I am sure the actual regulations refers to audible sound.
peterL  
#3 Posted : 04 April 2016 15:04:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
peterL

Hi,

If you have set your meter to normal hearing range i.e. 1000 - 1500hz the reading will be within the hearing range - if you have completed octave band analysis, then all ranges up to 21000hz will be covered, either way mandatory hearing protection will be required because all levels of over exposure can have detrimental affect on the cilia within the ear canal.

Pete,
pato1969  
#4 Posted : 04 April 2016 15:13:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pato1969

Alfasev wrote:
I am sure the actual regulations refers to audible sound.


yes I agree it does state Noise is an audible sound , hence why I considered us not at risk , but still needed to consider any damage caused to the ears even though we may not be able to actually hear the noise.
peterL  
#5 Posted : 04 April 2016 15:13:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
peterL

To clarify 20 - 21000hz is the typical hearing range of a young person, but this deteriorates with age, as stated 1000hz to around top end of 5000hz are frequencies we normally respond to / hear efficiently.

Pete,
pato1969  
#6 Posted : 04 April 2016 15:19:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pato1969

Thanks Pete , and sorry for sounding a bit dim, are you saying with this issue , even though we may not be able to hear the noise from the Sonic cutter we should make hearing defence mandatory due to the fact the noise meter is picking up the noise to be around the 90db level , as the operators are exposed for a number of hours per day.
peterL  
#7 Posted : 05 April 2016 09:27:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
peterL

Hi,

If the noise emitted is within the ranges identified in my previous mail then yes you will need to manage or reduce the exposure,

Pete,
IanDakin  
#8 Posted : 05 April 2016 10:08:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi

Have you considered using noise dose badges? As you have measured the noise levels as part of a risk assessment and have identified a potential risk to hearing, you should then measure the exposure.

You can hire dose badges that will measure the noise exposure in the human hearing range (dBA) and the peak pressure exposure (dBC). They will also time weight it for you.

If you do have a problem then you need to look at engineering controls before looking at hearing protection.

Check out the HSE site on noise risk assessment.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/noise/risks.htm

Ian
James Robinson  
#9 Posted : 05 April 2016 12:28:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
James Robinson

This may help;

http://www.hse.gov.uk/re...rr_pdf/2001/crr01343.pdf

Looks at 10-20, and 20+

James
gramsay  
#10 Posted : 05 April 2016 14:41:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Hi pato,

What are you using to measure the machinery noise? The measurement needs a filter applied to it which makes it sensitive at different frequencies in approximately the same way as adult human hearing. The filter normally used is called A-weighting and the measurement you end up with should be displayed on the device as dB(A), dBA, LAeq=xx or something similar - basically there should be a capital A in it.

It sounds like that's not happening with your own measurement.

If you tell us how you got the measurement we can help you make sure it's usable. Good luck.
peterL  
#11 Posted : 05 April 2016 15:50:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
peterL

And remember the noise level has to be over the lower threshold spread over an eight hour period (TWA) for controls to be necessary, short term exposure may not trigger the need to impose control measures.

Pete,
pato1969  
#12 Posted : 06 April 2016 08:37:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pato1969

thanks everyone for your help & comments , we have managed to add soundproofing around the casing of the cutter , which has resolved the issue.
Alfasev  
#13 Posted : 06 April 2016 09:05:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev

Out of interest pato1969 did you manage to record the frequency (Hz) of the sound and what if any information did the manufacture or importers give you.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.