Rank: Forum user
|
Hello Folks
I am looking to improve how we analyse our accidents and near misses etc. At present we use a very simple excel spread sheet where we basically just breakdown non reportable and reportable accidents. We then state how we take corrective action for each accident. Is there any guidance on analysing accidents? Would anybody mind sharing how they analyse accidents i.e. template etc. Really appreciate some help? Eddy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Any data analysis depends on the quality of the data itself so the first step would be to figure out what you want to get out of the analysis. Then design your data entry system so that there is minimal opportunity for mis-entry.
If you want to classify different types of incident and injury/harm it is essential that your definitions are very clear and that those doping the reporting/entry fully understand the categories.
If you are a large enough organisation you may wish to consider departments, shifts, activities. The list can be endless.
BUT, remember those doing the entries - they will get very fed up if it takes ages to record a broken fingernail!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Trigger/ Causation
injury type
injury severity
department
activity-STF, Man Hand, etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There is software you can purchase which will help in reporting, investigating, corrective actions and categorisation of accidents and incidents. As a rule I'm not keen on h&s software, but due to the complexity of this subject using software might be the answer.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
There is good software, which you can demos on. We are looking at MS 365. In the interim you can't go far wrong if you look at;
- nature of accidents (>3d, >7d, non reportable, fatalities etc)
- causes of accidents (slip/trip, fall from ht, electric shock etc)
- secondary / underlying causes
- department / section
- manager
- etc...
The information you get will allow you to look at any patterns, trends and causes that should point to potential solutions, which may require soft (eg training) or hard (eg. guarding)measures.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Eddy one main issue , Body part that injury occurred..This would help you to have better strategic plan and define better control measures for area which is unguarded.
SHV
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No one has mentioned 'potential'.
It's a good idea to record 'reasonable worst case potential' in some way, i.e. how lucky was the organisation in this case. You can record both how severe an injury could have been and also how many other people are exposed to similar hazards. Doing so not only helps you to focus investigation effort on those events with the highest potential for harm, but also provides trend data to show whether you re getting better at controlling your most significant hazards.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Agreed, but the potential consequences can only be properly ascertained following a robust investigation. Of course, the same principle would apply to near misses - which have not been highlighted either.
The problem here as I alluded to in my original post, the parameters involved in accident/incident data can be very complex. Causation factors alone could go into dozens alone.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.