Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Carrietobin  
#1 Posted : 22 July 2016 14:00:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Carrietobin

Hi all, What do people think of P50 extinguishers?? Are they really as great a cost saving as the manufacturers tell us, or are there hidden costs? Can anyone share any personal experiences with them?? Whats the good and the bad about them, compared to ordinary extinguishers? Thanks
firesafety101  
#2 Posted : 22 July 2016 14:57:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I didn't know anything until just looked at a short video, at first glance they do look good with a decent cost saving. One thing I would like to know is how do they know it has a life of 20 years? Have they got any still useable that started out in 1996? Also have they passed all the stringent tests that the other types have to?
davidhwatkins  
#3 Posted : 22 July 2016 15:05:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
davidhwatkins

I've been looking into P50 extinguishers as I like the one simplicity of use for the user. I liked the reduced servicing costs and if I was honest, I also like the technology behind them too. Although they are rated to be used on 'electrical fires' I felt that the biggest challenge was the possibility of the water pooling and in turn electrocuting the operator.
mssy  
#4 Posted : 23 July 2016 00:10:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

Now here’s a controversial and ‘Marmite’ bit of kit!! The P50 have a 20 year life (that can be extended further) and the suppliers, Britannia, say that anyone (not necessarily a competent person) can carry out the annual maintenance. That is a hugely appealing prospect to businesses who could save a shedload of ca$h This servicing concept is contrary to BS5306-3 or BS5306-8, which are standards used by enforcing authority to determine whether systems are ‘suitable & sufficient’ However, one enforcing authority – Essex F&R – are now selling this extinguishers through their business arm. In itself a fire authority endorsing and selling and firefighting kit is controversial, but selling the P50s make this very controversial indeed and has sparked a bit of a battle. The Fire Industry Association (FIA) produced this webpage which says how wonderful P50s are: http://www.fia.uk.com/ne...tained-extinguisher.html Meanwhile the Independent Fire Engineering & Distributors Association (IFEDA) are scathing, saying that they and British Standards, Lloyds, BAFE, BRE and all leading insurance companies are opposed to the concept of P50s which they say encourage an ‘install and forget’ mentality. So who is right? I reckon if Brittania had invented an ever lasting tyre, I am sure Dunlop, Pirelli, Michelin and other big boys would be critical. However, an unproven extinguisher that is merely inspected against a checklist for 20 years, does worry me a bit We have bought 4 x P50 units to trial at two sites which are located in remote rural parts of the UK and where we face additional servicing costs. However, we are maintaining BS approved extinguishers alongside the P50s as I am not convinced yet that P50s are the way forward
Harry Dewick-Eisele  
#5 Posted : 23 July 2016 13:41:41(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Harry Dewick-Eisele

Hi Carrietobin I need to declare my interest in this topic right at the beginning: I am the MD of Safelincs, the UK's main distributor of the P50 extinguishers. However, I would like to present our views with regards to this product, if that is acceptable. The question with regards to the 20 year life span is, of course, justified. The answer is a little lengthy so please bear with me: 1) The 20 years lifespan is applicable if you have your P50 refurbished by us or the manufacturer Britannia after 10 years. We will re-fill the extinguisher and replace the outer sleeve, boot, hose and tags. The valve head and the aramid-covered inner cylinder are re-used and re-tested. So the extinguishing agent, the sleeve, boot and hose are only guaranteed for ten years. 2) The inner cylinder has been guaranteed for twenty years by the two raw material providers involved in the manufacture of the inner cylinder. 3) The valve head (bar the fact it has duplicate gauges) is similar to valve heads used by Norwich-based Britannia since the 1970s, so there is significant experience with regards to the lifespan of valve heads produced by Britannia. With regards to the extinguishing agents lasting ten years; again, the suppliers of the chemicals have guaranteed their chemicals for ten years (as long as they are contained in the inner cyclinder as used in the P50). In addition there have been acceleration test to determine the life span of the chemicals, which have confirmed a lifespan in excess of 10 years. With regards to general tests. The P50 is probably the world's most tested fire extinguisher! It is, of course, kitemarked and CE marked. In addition it has been certified b LPCB, PRAGAZ, MPA Dresden, MCA and is approced for marine use. The P50 is also specifically approved or even recommended by many insurers. In addition to normal extinguisher tests in accordance to British Standards, the P50 is also tested in accordance to the Pressure Equipment Directive, a most taxing test usually reserved for propane gas containers! We have installed the P50 in insurance headquarters, office blocks, schools, refineries, farms, universities, colleges, churchase, cathedrals and many more locations, providing customers significant savings and reducing the environmental impact of fire fighting equipment and servicing. Kind Regards Harry
Messy  
#6 Posted : 23 July 2016 18:02:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Messy

Thanks for that interesting post Harry from a very informed source. My main concern is how P50s are or would be received by enforcement authorities. The 4 we have (on 'trial') are in lications not likely to be audited by an Inspecting Officer and we have standard FFE at these sites too We have around 2000 extinguishers across our estate. I know I can make huge savings for my employer (and significant brownie points for me!) if I introduced P50s. But I fear a luddite Inspecting Officer or anxious enforcing authority issued an Enforcement Notice which led to us replacing the P50s at great cost So can you reassure me that this will not happen??
firesafety101  
#7 Posted : 24 July 2016 12:28:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Harry, many thanks for your post, excellent information. Messy, why not contact the enforcement officers in writing to get their views. If they respond in writing then you have some support. I always find having a chat with the fire safety officers, especially as I still know some of them, works well.
mssy  
#8 Posted : 24 July 2016 21:10:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

The problem is that I deal with around 20 Enforcement Authorities in all parts of the UK. What London might be relaxed about accepting, Norfolk wont be - and Cornwall will laugh in your face. OK, just examples, but you get my drift. Maybe Harry can offer some words of support as at present, we simply cannot afford to change to P50s unless we know they will be accepted by all enforcement agencies across the UK It seem to me that only when the P50 is accepted by the BSI will that be possible. But I am open to persuasion
Harry Dewick-Eisele  
#9 Posted : 25 July 2016 10:35:58(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Harry Dewick-Eisele

Hi Mssy and firesafety101 The main legal requirement for fire extinguisher maintenance is defined in the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order with additional guidance drawn from British Standards, which are only best practice recommendations, though. The RRO requests periodic inspection, maintenance and testing, with annual maintenance to be carried out by a competent person. Like for all extinguishers, there is a requirement to monthly check the presence and status of the P50 extinguishers with the findings recorded in the fire safety logbook. In addition there has to be an annual full visual inspection by a representative of the owners checking the dual gauges for correct operation (these are magnetic and checked with a magnet supplied with each extinguisher), the hose for blockage, the tags for presence and the body for any damages. Again, this is recorded in the fire safety logbook and, in addition, on the back of the P50 extinguisher. While this annual inspection requires no specialist skills and can be carried out by every able person we train staff when we carry out the installation. We also issue training certificates to document the competence of the trained staff. New staff can easily be trained with a training video available on the internet. Refill is required after ten years and has to be carried out by a person fully qualified for extinguisher refills; we would expect this to be carried out at the factory or by us. The above process fulfils all legal requirements. Some aspects of the current British Standards, with their requirements for refill after 5 years and annual service by (usually) an external engineer, cannot apply, as you would expect. However, this fact is covered by BSI in a clause that prevents technological progress being stifled by out of date standards. To give you some assurance with regards to enforcing bodies it is worth mentioning that Blue Watch, CFOA's (Chief Fire Officers Association) trading arm is selling P50 fire extinguishers http://www.bluewatchshop.co.uk/ You are welcome to contact me directly if you require a list of references. Our customer list includes some of the UK's most prestigious organisations, including courts, councils, a parliament building and many others. Harry
firesafety101  
#10 Posted : 25 July 2016 14:09:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Thanks again Harry. Messy I do hear what you say and it may be laborious for you but when you get the answer from each individual FSO you will know where you stand. You have mentioned the potential cost saving to your employer but isn't it worth a few brownie points for yourself ha ha Why not just get the individual FRS websites up and ask the question. Won't take up too much time will it ? Good luck matey
IRSafe  
#11 Posted : 28 July 2016 15:52:53(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
IRSafe

We have recommended the P50 for several clients now. Well received - particularly with reduced servicing etc.
chris42  
#12 Posted : 28 July 2016 16:22:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

I remembered a previous discussion but could not remember the outcome. Interesting post by DP back in 2015. http://forum.iosh.co.uk/...spx?g=posts&t=116257
kwoodhouse  
#13 Posted : 24 September 2019 11:57:47(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kwoodhouse

Can anyone advise if the P50s are any good to use on machinery or do they cause too much mess/damage?

MarkAAT  
#14 Posted : 26 September 2019 10:44:41(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
MarkAAT

Originally Posted by: kwoodhouse Go to Quoted Post

Can anyone advise if the P50s are any good to use on machinery or do they cause too much mess/damage?

Hello there..

The p50 extinguishers still have the same medium in them as other manufacturers.

IE a P50 with 6kg of ABC Powder is the same as a Firechief 6KG ABC Powder. So a proper risk assessment would find out which medium you need, it doesn't make a difference who the manufacturer is.

CptBeaky  
#15 Posted : 26 September 2019 10:52:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
CptBeaky

To extrapolate from that. ABC powder will pretty much destroy any machine you spray it on (or at least give you one hell of a clean up job). However it does a fantastic job of putting out most machine fires. At our plant we would use CO² for a small fire, and ABC powder if in any doubt. Thankfully this has never been put in to action.

Willh5080  
#16 Posted : 17 June 2020 09:26:32(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Willh5080

Hello! Which type of fire extinguishers is better for home use and wich is better for car? I need both of them. I read that powder fire extinguishers are good for everything. Is it true? And which from these fire extinguishers are good? https://www.bestadvisers.co.uk/fire-extinguishers It's have some discounts now, so it would be good if i buy one of them))

Roundtuit  
#17 Posted : 17 June 2020 09:30:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Reported. It is not best practice to have an FE in a car as there is insufficient capacity to adequately deal with say a typical engine bay fire.W
Roundtuit  
#18 Posted : 17 June 2020 09:30:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Reported. It is not best practice to have an FE in a car as there is insufficient capacity to adequately deal with say a typical engine bay fire.W
HSSnail  
#19 Posted : 17 June 2020 09:32:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

I agree Roundtuit - sales pitch trying to discuse itself as a question.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.