Rank: Forum user
|
Our German parent company has informed us that our Insurance Company in Germany have accepted the classification of suicide as a work-related accident. Consequently, we are requested to report such incidents in future (not that we have had any, yet at least).
I note from RIDDOR, that suicides are specifically excluded from RIDDOR reporting.
After a brief exchange fo emails with our German colleagues, it would seem that they also want to include suicides at home as a potentially work-related accident. I see huge problems with this aspect in particular, but what are the thoughts of the forum in general, on the issue of suicide as a reportable accident?
Comment, discuss...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Well you can include anything as an internally reportable accident. I was once told of a Swiss pharma company that even investigated accidents to staff at home eg falling off a ladder while decorating the dining room on the grounds that the sort of person who is likely to have a daft accident at home is more likely top have one at work. That is what they wanted to do and that it their business. Obviously you would not report that as a RIDDOR cos that is not what the HSE want. There are differences between countries in what they expect to be reported. For example in most European countries an accident while driving to work is regarded as a work place incident but here it is not.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
workplace mental health is a minefield...I have come across 2 cases in 2 years where in the post investigation medical assessment they were found to be diagnosed with suicidal tendencies but this wasn't followed up..these were safety critical workers. So although I would agree with considering it as part of the OH review of the case and I agree with your German colleagues. If you want to record it internally that is fine and a step in the right direction, it doesn't have anything to do with what you report under RIDDOR.
https://data.oecd.org/healthstat/suicide-rates.htm
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I would accept a suicide at work is an 'incident' but not an accident. Indeed there are many unusual events which might be classed as an incident but are not RIDDORs. We once had a fatality due to a violent act, but it was not a RIDDOR.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
That's a good point actually, an incident, not an accident.
Suicide by definition is an intentional act. I would accept (if it could be proven) work-related contributory factors or maybe even direct causation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
hserc
Since you explicitly state that the proposal about reporting suicide came from a German company, it may well be that the proposal is influenced by the murder-suicide actions of a German pilot last year, after which not only the employer but also the German regulatory system was publicly criticised for its system of management of psychological illhealth.
Instead of concentrating on a symptom of 'suicide', why not focus on what you can control, namely appropriate measures to maintain high levels of occupational health that generally pre-empt suicide (and other forms of violence) in the UK?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A huge problem really? How often does this happen? Have been in H&S now for over 30 years with a number of employers, but employee numbers always in the thousands. In all that time I have only ever know one person who committed suicide. very said but due to other health and personal issues not work related. These cases are always terrible for friends and family but fortunately I believe they are very rare. You would not include them in a RIDDOR report as they are excluded, but if the company wants them on an internal report that's up to them. As I say wont they be so rare that I cannot see how the report would cause a huge problem.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Not a mention of work colleagues who could be affected by the suicide of a colleague.....
As far as the individual themselves it's inherently difficult to plan for such an occasion, or potentially identify any indicators that a person has such a mind-set
I deal with circa 5 incidents a year of attempted suicide in my workplace and have been involved in the aftermath of 2 successful 'attempts' in the last five years, traumatic to say the least
In my experience the resource is required within the workforce to provide support for those dealing with the aftermath
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If an organisation is serious about trying to manage mental health issues, one service often provided is a confidential helpline for employees (interestingly, contractors are usually excluded, even where they are supervised by an employee - which makes no sense, for example when you look at the key influencing factors for work-related stress).
But you should then anticipate there may be common work-related factors that could be identified from helpline contacts, and not concentrate just on counselling the individual. So the organisation should insist that anonymised feedback of any apparent work-related factors is part of the helpline contract. If that isn't part of the thinking, I suggest that perhaps the concern about suicide is more lip service than reality?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A non-sequestered, reflective employer that has utmost regard for its workforce?
What a concept!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just to put this into context, suicide is a far bigger risk in construction than falls from height as construction workers are six times as likely to die from suicide than incidents or falls onsite.
See: http://www.constructionm...ti3mes-more-lik5ely-die/
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This the underlying point is that if you start to measure it then you have to somehow manage the risk...
It is not just about the work related factors, if any, there are also the post trauma counselling for those involved in the aftermath...been there most Dec/Jan especially M1 between Barnsley & Meadowhall..!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This could be something lost in translation. Is it your insurance company asking for this (odd)? or the relevant statutory accident insurance bureau ( a lot more likely)? Individuals in Germany don't pay national insurance as such and subsequently don't have a health care system free at point of use.
Employers pay levies to the relevant insurance body (different than insurance companies) and they can adjust the rate paid dependant on an individual businesses H&S performance. For interest, that's why commuting is considered to be 'at work' in Germany. it's based on the fact that someone would have to pick up the medical bill if there were an accident and you wouldn't be making that journey were it not for work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
It should not be taken as work related issue because suicide is a crime. It's some like intentionally killing oneself. If it is proven as suicide nothing can be done.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
An interesting aspect to this thread is the amount of research being carried out into suicide as a result/contributing factor of work related stress-report them by all means. [Australia and here in France where Orange telecom have lost a high number of workers it is believed to work related stress.] Reportedly due to serious levels of bullying, excessive pressures, etc and the like yet again. This was 2014, I'm unsure of the current position but I shall attempt to find outi
You can find this sort of info on the net widely publicised
I recollect discussion of Workplace stress and the possibility of suicide as an outcome. I agree there are often other possible causes close to home but these do not negate the above. I well recollect one of my students [M.Sc] referring to a senior manager who was seriously affected as a result apparently of his treatment at the hands of even more senior management etc
In my students case-mature, trade union ex HSRep, he referred to the guy jumping off a multi story car park some time after essentially breaking down in a meeting. Suffice it to say it was not completely out of the blue
Needless to say it was not publicised [or any support provided]
And these aren't the first and will not be the last even in my own organisations
So much for legal protection-Sports Direct anyone? Plus any amount of oil, miners, defence and other Multi Nationals
Regards
Mike
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
People should remember when it comes to reporting requirements, that RIDDOR is what it is. By that I mean that the reporting requirements do not relate to a duty of care or the seriousness of the issue. They are just a list of things that needed to be reported. In previous life on the same week I investigated serious breach of procedure that could have easily led to someone death but it was not one of those occurrences that had to be reported, I had to report under RIDDOR an equipment failure (failure of a pressurised system) which did not pose any risk to anybody.
This is why everybody should a) have their own internal reporting requirements, based on what is really important rather than relying on the criteria under RIDDOR and b) using RIDDORS to compare organisations is somewhat suspect.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi AK
And we should try and extend the list to include other important accidents and causes of injuries as has been the case since NADOR, etc and should, of course, include road accidents as 1/4-1/3 or more are caused at work or through work and suicides too-difficult yes. You might even do something about workplace stress reporting-one day
But nothing was ever meant to be easy.
We could even have a thread for those to be included.
We have after all finally alighted on a proper sentencing regime unlike the derisory stuff of the past.
Perhaps we may get a sensible corporate manslaughter regime but don't hold your breath
Bon chance
Mike
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
trying to get back to the original question.
If your German parent company's insurance company say you have to do it and you don't, you may invalidate your insurance policy.
If it's been a miss-communication and it's the BG that have said your German parent company have to do it and they don't, they'll be exposed to legal action (but only in Germany for their actions in Germany, what you do in UK won't matter).
If your German parent company expect you to follow suit in the UK just for sake of standardised reporting and you don't, you'll be in breach of their company policy.
It's got nothing to do with RIDDOR whatsoever!!!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.