Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
clarkyb  
#1 Posted : 05 September 2016 16:01:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clarkyb

Hi Guys I was hoping someone could help. We have a 32 tonne forklift truck which is operated indoors and outdoors along uneven surfaces, various weather conditions, near a waters edge and in and around other plant and machinery. The forklift truck is a 2013 model but for some reason does not have seat belts (one would assume that they'd be an automatic inclusion). I am of the opinion that following my risk assessment they should be fitted and have called a meeting with management to recommend that these are retro fitted to the machine. I can already foresee the counter arguments from their side - cost and the fact that the machines are 2013 and they do not have seat restraints in and as such will not be required. Has anyone else encountered this issue?
Alfasev  
#2 Posted : 05 September 2016 16:22:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev

This may help. http://press.hse.gov.uk/...ced-over-forklift-death/ http://press.hse.gov.uk/...t-truck-operator-killed/ and remind them of the new sentencing guidelines. I always give them an idea what since find they will get.
Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 05 September 2016 16:30:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

You foresee a 32 MT lift truck toppling? Or is there a missing decimal point 3.2 MT? If the travel route is very uneven and your company RA indicates potential injury from a roll over you should be resolve the surface even suspending any outdoor operation until fixed. You haven't mentioned if the FLT was new purchase, second hand or on a hire arrangement - either way first tack would be to challenge the vendor/hirer regarding suitability for supply
Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 05 September 2016 16:30:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

You foresee a 32 MT lift truck toppling? Or is there a missing decimal point 3.2 MT? If the travel route is very uneven and your company RA indicates potential injury from a roll over you should be resolve the surface even suspending any outdoor operation until fixed. You haven't mentioned if the FLT was new purchase, second hand or on a hire arrangement - either way first tack would be to challenge the vendor/hirer regarding suitability for supply
rick448  
#5 Posted : 05 September 2016 16:54:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
rick448

I assume the wearing of a seat belt is just part of your control measures. As above, it would be more beneficial to eliminate or at least reduce the likelihood of a roll over by improving the ground conditions rather than relying on a seat belt to prevent any injuries. Yes the wearing of a seat belt may reduce the severity (although maybe not near the waters edge!) but I think the issue of roll over is the main hazard here.
Mr.Flibble2.0  
#6 Posted : 05 September 2016 17:02:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mr.Flibble2.0

The requirement for all new FLT's to be fitted with seat belts came into effect in 2002 I would question why this is not the case with your truck and has someone just removed it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.