Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Mark Griffin  
#1 Posted : 05 September 2016 20:30:00(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Mark Griffin

Evening, Had a PI claim come through to us as a contractor, Employee has had an accident but come through direct to us as a contractor. Should this not go through their Employer first as he/she has the responsibility to provide a safe place of work? Although I realise we all should have a duty of care. As a matter of process should the employee claim through their employer first and then the employer try to counter-sue us? I ask because our employee did not receive any on site training or viewed any kind of RA so in my opinion this should be thrown back to the employer under sect 4 of the HSAWA and also the workplace regs 1992. Advice would be welcome.
Kate  
#2 Posted : 05 September 2016 20:45:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Anyone can try to claim against anyone they like - a claim against you doesn't become invalid just because there may also be grounds (even better grounds) for a claim against someone else. All you can do is refer it to your insurer and they will work out how best to handle it.
jde  
#3 Posted : 06 September 2016 10:11:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jde

Unfortunately he is probably trying to cut out his employer who would no doubt enjoin you into the claim. You don't mention if you were the PC on the job, if you were, then ultimately you would be liable for what happened on your site. As Kate says, gather all the info you can re the incident and pass to your insurer. Good luck
Waz  
#4 Posted : 12 September 2016 12:00:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Waz

As I see it, under the 'legal' aspect - the duty and 'contract of employment' is between employee and employer. The employer has duties under HASAWA (as does employee), but the contractor also has duties under said (Section 4 at a guess). Therefore, the employer puts his claim to the employer, they present their documentation to the Insurers and its taken from there!
Waz  
#5 Posted : 12 September 2016 12:07:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Waz

Amended: As I see it, under the 'legal' aspect - the duty and 'contract of employment' is between employee and employer. The employer has duties under the HASAWA (as does employee), but the contractor also has duties under said act (Section 4 at a guess). Therefore, the employee puts his claim to the employer, they present their documentation to the Insurers and its taken from there!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.