Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Brown900431  
#1 Posted : 24 October 2016 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brown900431

Morning everyone,

I'm trying to update risk assessments in a welding workshop, where they do primarily MIG and flame cutting. I have to admit that its a bit out of my comfort zone.

I can't find any evidence of any previous air sampling being done and the work shop only has general ventilation with the welders have powered air fed RPE.

Reading a previous post one person advised that rather than spend time/money air sampling it was best to just assume the level of fume was over the WEL and spend the money on good local exhaust ventilation. This seems to make sense but I know I'm going to have to have my facts straight before I talk to management.

I started reading the TWI website and it got a bit technical.

If anyone could offer advice on a stratergy to get a good risk assessment that protects but doesn't go over the top I'd be eternally grateful.

Alan Haynes  
#2 Posted : 24 October 2016 10:22:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alan Haynes

Have you looked at;-

http://www.hse.gov.uk/welding/guidance/job3.htm

Jane Blunt  
#3 Posted : 24 October 2016 11:15:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

You haven't given us enough information to say. There would normally be significant quantities of nuisance particlate from MIG welding, so ventilation should be provided.

You need to say what materials you are welding - for some materials very large quantities of ozone are emitted.

Flame cutting can produce large quantities of nitrogen oxides.

gerrysharpe  
#4 Posted : 24 October 2016 12:51:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gerrysharpe

I would concentrate on improving your Extraction as opposed to spending money on air sampling. If your welders are  wearing air fed masks and their Air is being filter, that on its own is not enough for dealing with Fumes, You need to provide adequate extraction, By means of an Extractor system and Flexable tubes and hoods.

As its been stated different welding processes create differen levels of Fumes, especially Flux core welding and MMA (Stick) welding.

​​​​​​​

Jane Blunt  
#5 Posted : 24 October 2016 13:06:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

I agree with Gerry. Extraction is important.

The other thing you need to bear in mind is that although your welders are being protected by power fed RPE, anyone else going in there isn't. You also need to be aware that the finer particulates from welding don't fall to the floor quickly - they hang around in the air for a long time. They are best removed at source.

Brown900431  
#6 Posted : 24 October 2016 16:11:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brown900431

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

We're primarily MIG welding/cutting mild steel, from what I'm told if we do anything 'high risk' like aluminium or stainless we hire a mobile extraction/filter unit.

I've had a look at the HSE link to WL10 MIG and MAG Welding, and that says main engineering controls are: good general & local ventilation and RPE. I'm assuming use of all three controls is good practice regardless of the amount time welding, the material being welded, the wire being used, the location etc etc. 

My common sense says make the above recommendation without air sampling that way the exposure is 'as low as reasonably practicable' everytime regardless of all the variables. As you say Jane exposure is very complex and not just during the weld, it can be for hours afterwards, I'm not clever enough for that risk assessment!

So in summary; with limited funds and intelligence to do a very complex risk assessment, spend money on extraction rather than air sampling? Correct?

Jane Blunt  
#7 Posted : 24 October 2016 18:57:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Yes, I would recommend local exhaust ventilation. Air sampling is then not needed.

bob youel  
#8 Posted : 25 October 2016 07:50:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

And the opening of an appropriate window/door or 2 or allowing some other form of controlled (draught) air change can allow a sensible air flow that does not negatively effect quality nor people can be as good as anything at no cost (i ran whole teams of welders and fabricators for years with no adverse affects using such systems) 

Best of luck

Hally  
#9 Posted : 25 October 2016 08:01:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

We use a mixture of air-feds with either LEV or torch extraction, as some of our work is repairs or constant movement around objects we've found torch to work sufficiently. One thing as Jane points out is other people going in or past the workshop, the HSE if they came in would pull you up on that if they saw it. Might be ok if the welding was done at an end area/workshop with no possible passers by and controlled but very doubtful. Do you use any chemicals at all within the workshops, asking as we do so it changes what could be in the air?
FG  
#10 Posted : 25 October 2016 08:56:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
FG

Following on from the issue of people walking by the process, another thing to consider is EMF overexposure.  The new regs which came out in July require exposure assessments to be carried out for the operatives which factor in variables used in the weld procedure which affect field strength and the proximity of the operator to the job.  

TWI have software specifically for this, but depending on the number of procedures, this could get very costly, very fast!  I suspect the best compromise in such a situation is to find out the factors which influence field strength the most and implement blanket policy based on your likely worst case scenario

In the immediete term, I'd recommend a sign ior two hilighting the danger to those wearing pacemakers / other bodily implants.

Brown900431  
#11 Posted : 25 October 2016 09:07:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brown900431

Bob, thats effectively what we've been doing for years, but my concern is that we don't really know if the exposure has been over, close to or under the WEL - so my logic says if we want to continue doing this we'll need to sample to prove its below the WEL. Where would we stand with regard to 'as low as is reasonably practicable' rather than just squeaking under the WEL?

to further complicate things its classed as an indoor workplace and the guys are saying its too cold with all the doors open. How do we maintain 16 degrees C whilst maintaining the air flow?

FG - EMF?! I'll add it onto my list of questions to ask on the forum!! LOL

Thanks for all the advice, i really appreciate the help.

DaveW71  
#12 Posted : 04 January 2017 14:20:42(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
DaveW71

I have a similar question. We use LEV but some of the welders also use a variety of RPE under their helmets. Assuming the LEV works these should be belts to add to braces yes? I checked the MSDS and cannot see what the recomended RPE type would be for this work. I am loathed to go down the air fed route when there is adequate LEV in place, but if we do provide a mask what sort would be of use? Thanks.

stuart46  
#13 Posted : 04 January 2017 15:35:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stuart46

Hi all,

This has been touched on earlier, but surely you need to carry out some air monitoring after the installation of the LEV otherwise how do you know it's working effectively?

Striker84  
#14 Posted : 05 January 2017 21:30:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Striker84

Risk assessing the process/task would highlight Hazards such as build up of/escape of harmful gasses Controll measures would include good ventilation, COSHH Certification for LEV required every 14 months, PPE (welding visors with power fed respiration), flash back arrestors, ignition source controll, regular breaks, etc etc. Additional control measures required if not already implemented would be an air quality test (generally performed by external environmental specialists due to laboratory resources required) For anybody thinking about EMF............I have spent days on research and dealing with not only H&S Practitioners but also lecturers within the electrical industry and now have a good understanding of how to measure and the requirements set out under the CEMFAW regulations/EMF directive so please feel free to ask any questions and where possible I shall answer. Regards GARY
johnanthonyscott  
#15 Posted : 18 March 2017 16:19:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnanthonyscott

As Gary points out air monitoring must be carried out every 14 months to assess exposure levels.

sappery760  
#16 Posted : 19 March 2017 09:10:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sappery760

In addition; in my view the H&S bod should NOT be doing the risk assessment they should be facilitating the manager/welders to undertake the task as otherwise there is no ownership and gathering info [as u are doing] is a must but the operators and managers should also be the owners of the process

best of luck

thanks 1 user thanked sappery760 for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 21/03/2017(UTC)
johnmurray  
#17 Posted : 19 March 2017 16:35:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Health surveillance.......

Bigmac1  
#18 Posted : 20 March 2017 21:43:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bigmac1

Originally Posted by: johnanthonyscott Go to Quoted Post

As Gary points out air monitoring must be carried out every 14 months to assess exposure levels.

No it doesnt, LEV needs tested every 14 months
hannahbilson  
#19 Posted : 21 March 2017 07:37:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
hannahbilson

The procedure accodring to which you have to do this is: 1.Remove grease and all surface coatings first, unless they are meant to be welded or cut through. 2.Arrange work so that the worker’s head is out of the fume. 3.Confirm that extraction is turned on and working. 4.Adjust a moveable welding hood so it collects hot fume rising. The hood should be within one duct diameter of the welding point. 5.Workers should stand to the side of a booth, not in the air flow. 6.Check for gas leaks. Also a little bit about equipment's: 1.Provide a good standard of general ventilation; 5-10 air changes per hour, with a through draught. 2.Provide an extracted welding booth, an extracted workbench or a moveable capture hood. See illustrations 3.You may also need to use respiratory protective equipment (RPE) 4.You need an air speed of at least 2 metres per second into an extracted welding bench.​​​​​​​

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.