Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ron Hunter  
#1 Posted : 10 May 2017 10:56:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Hardly new, but for many of us an "emerging risk"!

Has anyone out there done any definitive assessment informed by dosimeter info. on actual or typical exposure (to harmful constituents) to road workers during coring, planing, resurfacing, patching, handling of waste, etc.?

If you have, would you be willing to share your findings?

I'm hoping that (this being outdoor work) that exposure to the various nasty constituents is well below WELs and of course there are other practical and pragmatic things we can do to further minimise exposure, without resorting to RPE for road workers!

I'm not concerned about dermal exposure. These guys are already well protected by PPE for bitumen splashes etc., dermal exposure shouldn't be a big deal.

peter gotch  
#2 Posted : 10 May 2017 12:01:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi Ron

Not a lot of tar left in our roads, though my understanding is that there are a few geographic hot spots. We used to run a number of highways materials laboratories but no longer, so my knowledge base is out of date.

Bitumen poses much lower risks than tar.

Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 10 May 2017 12:25:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

We aer in a bit of a hot spot unfortunately (Fife).

This has only 'emerged' as a H&S risk following Environment Agency issues with waste classification.

jay  
#4 Posted : 10 May 2017 13:56:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

My understanding is that we use "Bitumen" which is an Oil Refinery product and not Coal Tar.

You can refer to SDS of the pre-mix bitumen with agregate or pure bitumen--and see that there is unlikely to be the fumes above WEL unless in confined locations

As is the case with most liquid & also viscous hydrocarbons, especially the risk to contaminate the water resources etc. 

Edited by user 10 May 2017 13:57:09(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Ron Hunter  
#5 Posted : 10 May 2017 14:30:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Jay, the issue is an historic one. Coal Tat was used as a road surface material up until the 1980's.

We encounter it during excavations, planing, etc. and it's nasty stuff.

Ron Hunter  
#6 Posted : 10 May 2017 15:31:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

No idea what "Coal Tat" might be.  I meant Coal Tar!

paul.skyrme  
#7 Posted : 10 May 2017 18:07:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Any old tat they used to bury in the roads?

You know, what the criminals used to do with concrete wellies & people in the bottom of foundations?... ]:)

(Wicked jokey face by the way!)  I know it's not Friday, but, I am finished on site & off home tomorrow...

Just don't remind me I'm working in the office on Friday.

Adams29600  
#8 Posted : 11 May 2017 10:30:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Adams29600

Try www.koppers.com They process coal tar, but not in the UK any more.

biker1  
#9 Posted : 11 May 2017 10:40:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
biker1

From memory, phenol would probably be the most hazardous component of coal tar as far as inhalation and skin exposure is concerned. You could try a WEL for that.

chris42  
#10 Posted : 11 May 2017 12:25:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

This may be of interest and covers road tar, but not sure it answers your question of can it be managed without RPE, but may be worth a browse. If you can keep them away from the milling / machining process, will there be much dust kicked up after ? (note the difference between coal tar and road tar in the text). Secondly once up will the resurfacing heat the remaining layer to give off PAH's. You would have thought there would be lots of H&S people who deal with this issue on here who could help you with this without reinventing the wheel.

http://www.adeptnet.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Managing%20Reclaimed%20Asphalt%20v2016-1.pdf

A Kurdziel  
#11 Posted : 11 May 2017 12:48:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Coal Tar was essentially what was left over from the manufacture of Town Gas from coal. Before we started to pipe natural gas from the North Sea our gas came from coal. (Ancient history as described in a half remember Ladybird book!)

The coal tar was used on road surfaces until it was replaced by bitumen produced by the petrol- chemical industry.  One problem with coal tar is that it is not a single substance but a mixture and the composition of this mixture can vary. As said the coal-tar was itself often subject to further processing to extract useful components. What was left was used on the roads.

Nowadays bitumen has to be analysed before it can sold and should have an SDS. Nothing valid exists for coal tar. Furthermore the coal tar composition will change over time with the more volatile components evaporating but by how much is impossible to tell. It will depend on things like has the tar been exposed to the air or the elements or how warm it has gotten etc.

If you find a big deposit which you need to shift then it might be worth getting it analysed. I recommend the use of PPE when handling it anyway eg disposable boiler suit, gloves etc.  If working  in an enclosed space RPE might also be a good idea.

 

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.