Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
mikeeeeeboy  
#1 Posted : 31 May 2017 12:54:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mikeeeeeboy

Good afternoon all , 

Could anyone tell me if gullotines , grinders , die grinders , sanders , plate benders , pedestal drill require a PUWER Inspection and to be competent to carry out a PUWER inspection what is required ?

Many thanks in advance 

Mike 

RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 31 May 2017 13:23:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Mike

All of the equipment you have listed will fall under PUWER and will need periodical inspections. The frequency of inspections will depend on a number of factors e.g. your own RA, manufacturer's specifications, and possibly usage, age of the equipment, etc. Electrical equipment i.e. leads and plugs will need a PAT.

As a rule any person with sufficient knowledge of the machinery and working parts is capable of inspecting the equipment. End-users should inspect the equipment before use.

Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 31 May 2017 15:36:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Don't confuse PUWER Regulation 5 (maintenance) with Regulation 6 (Inspection).

Inspection only required:

(a) after installation and before being put into service for the first time; or

(b) after assembly at a new site or in a new location,

to ensure that it has been installed correctly and is safe to operate.

(2)  work equipment exposed to conditions causing deterioration which is liable to result in dangerous situations is inspected—

(a) at suitable intervals; and

(b) each time that exceptional circumstances which are liable to jeopardise the safety of the work equipment have occurred.

See L22 for further info

paul.skyrme  
#4 Posted : 31 May 2017 17:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

As has been already said, plus, the "inspector" must have adequate knowledge of what the equipment needs to comply with in the form of the requirements of PUWER, which is currently interpreted by HSE as current state-of-the-art.

i.e. current harmonised machinery standards, then one must analyse any deficiencies and decide on whether they are significant or not, with probably a documented risk assessment.

David H  
#5 Posted : 31 May 2017 18:54:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David H

It is the legal requirement of the "user" to ensure the safety of the equipment before first use or after the equeipment has been relocated as dictated by PUWER - therefore a PUWER assessment - which is only really  a risk assessment to ensure that the equipment is safe to use and periodical inspections are recorded.

There is no requirement of the installer or manufacturer to ensure PUWER compliance - It is the User before first use that has the duty of care.

Kind Regards

Stuart Smiles  
#6 Posted : 31 May 2017 21:44:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Stuart Smiles

In the iosh magazine, there was a link to a guide on puwer inspections, which I downloaded from british engineering services today, seems a good summary, doc entitled "the essential guide to fulfilling your puwer work equipment inspection obligations", needed to provide email address for download. www.britishengineeringservices.co.uk, previously our insurers asked us to use plant inspection services. plantinspectionservices.co.uk, also used company for jacks & torque wrenches - can't remember name off hand but it was done as a mobile service.(other organisations are available via Safed

In addition, a chat with insurers will identify if they have a preferred inspection organisation as part of their requirements, (typically plant etc), we used to get inspected either 1 or 2 times per year, depending on equipment pressure, lifting etc.

In addition, distinctions should be made on the independence of inspection from maintenance activity, so that you can be sure the inspector isn't swayed by the issue of maintenance they "don't want to do", If you have access to iso standards, they (british engineering services), referenced iso 17020, which i quick-read and felt was good setting out about what inspectors should be like. - see bsigroup for download/purchase options.

an old copy of the guide to maintaning roadworthiness (1998) edition also segregates vehicles into "driver tasks" manger duties, and safety inspections, for a simple, basic way of distributing/explaining activities to others, manufacturers should be able to provide a similar checklist/replacement manual etc. 

a different post / thread states look at hsg 129 for engineering workshops, and the activities you state are reflected within it's scope, so would give you a reference to that too. 

good luck

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.