Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ADALE  
#1 Posted : 14 June 2017 18:15:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi,

the eagle eyed of you may have caught my post earlier in the week about PPE assessments. I'm hoping to find anecdotal lessons to be learned from incorrect selection that moves away from th dry NEBOSH type stuff. 

Real life examples where consequences, serious or mild, were experienced where lessons were learned as part of the selection or implementing process where a closer look at the individual, risk and limitations of use or compatibility may have been beneficial.

I'm not hoping for anyone to get themself sacked or out of contract, light humour at best but valuable sharing if there are any brave souls out there.

Thanks in advance.

RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 15 June 2017 19:08:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Hi Adale

I think you have too much time on your hands, nevertheless, I can think of a case somewhile back where an employee suffered serious injuries due to wearing mandatory gloves whilst using rotating machinery. The gloves got caught in the rotating parts - gloves and machinery are not a good combination as rule. 

Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 15 June 2017 21:26:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Blanket Eye protection policy - everyone in light eye shields. Chemical spillage struck an employee ran down their face and after treatment significant vision loss warranting prescription glasses. The employee was wearing the mandated PPE unfortunately as they had eye "protection" failed to realise light impact resistance was no good for chemical issues. Corporate continued to insist that for insurance purposes every one wears - no incident history to validate policy, and hilariously when prompted most reported incidents were dust in the eye coming to / leaving work. Corporate never paid to resolve the rough standing car park at the top of the hill which was the causal factor behind recorded incidents
Users browsing this topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.