Rank: Forum user
|
Afternoon all How would I carry out a COSHH Assessment on the dust produced from sanding down bodywork? Any help on this one would be aprreciated as COSHH is not my strong point. Thank you
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It might be a good idea to bring someone in to do this- an industrial hygienist type person. But COSHH starts with identifying the hazard: - What is the dust you are looking at made of: check with EH40 to see if it has a WEL
- Try to assess if the WEL will be exceeded-you may need to do some monitoring
- Take into account how often people are exposed and how many people are exposed
Apply the hierarchy of controls. Ideally try to prevent exposure altogether; ask: - Do you need to use that particular substance? Can you replace it with something less hazardous
- Can you isolate the process in a cabinet or box
- Can you use a robot(you probably can’t but you ask the question)
- Can you reduce the number of people working in this area
- Can you use a local exhaust system to remove the dust
- Does the sander have a built in extraction system? What happens to the dust at the other end of the extraction system? How is it collected
- How do you clean up any dust that settles- don’t use a broom use a suitable vacuum cleaner
- Do the personnel have access to cleaning facilities? Can they remove their overalls without creating more exposure risk- could you use a disposable set of overalls
- PPE( including respiratory protection) is a last resort but if you go for make it suitable and make sure that it is properly maintained
- Does it fit the user- face fit testing for masks
- Make sure that they have somewhere to store the PPE safely so it does not get contaminated
And the rest….
PS You don't COSHH assess a substance you assess the process the substance is involved in.
|
 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Agree with all of the above however, do note that if you are unable to find the particular type of dust produced then it would come under the category of just ‘dust’:
Dust
44 The COSHH definition of a substance hazardous to health includes dust of any kind when present at a concentration in air equal to or greater than 10 mg.m-3 8-hour TWA of inhalable dust or 4 mg.m-3 8-hour TWA of respirable dust. This means that any dust will be subject to COSHH if people are exposed above these levels. Some dusts have been assigned specific WELs and exposure to these must comply with the appropriate limit.
45 Most industrial dusts contain particles of a wide range of sizes. The behaviour, deposition and fate of any particular particle after entry into the human respiratory system and the body response that it elicits, depend on the nature and size of the particle. HSE distinguishes two size fractions for limit-setting purposes termed ‘inhalable’ and ‘respirable’.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
With respect, this is not strictly correct. Consider what is now in the current ACoP:
Paragraph 10 - Employers should regard a substance as hazardous to health if it is hazardous in the form in which it may occur in the work activity. A substance hazardous to health need not be just a chemical compound, it can also include mixtures of compounds, micro-organisms or natural materials, such as flour, stone or wood dust.
In fact, even the original COSHH regulation covered this point. In the list of definitions of what constitutes a hazardous substance we have the following:
“(e) which, not being a substance falling within sub-paragraphs (a) to (d), because of its chemical or toxicological properties and the way it is used or is present at the workplace creates a risk to health” - COSHH Regulation 2 (1) Interpretation
My inerpretation of this is that you will need to establish what is in the paint and thus will be in the dust and base your risk assessment on this. This is just the same procedure as you would adopt if you were sanding down very old paintwork in a building that might contain lead. Treating this simply as nuisance dust is not really acceptable. This indicates an approach to the workplace that applied the original paint to obtain the relevant information about constituents and what might be the residual chemical once the paint has fully cured.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I absolutely agree with you, hence why I mentioned IF you are unable to find the particular ‘dust/substance’ then you will still need to look at the dust WEL and risk assess based around that. Edited by user 23 March 2018 19:48:04(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If you are unable to determine actual constituents then you have to assume worst case so possibly Lead and its salts, other pigments (Iron salts/Cobalt salts/Titanium Dioxide etc.) along with the carrier matrix e.g. cellulose and if your sanding paper is quartz (sand/silicon dioxide) based the possibilty of RCS
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If you are unable to determine actual constituents then you have to assume worst case so possibly Lead and its salts, other pigments (Iron salts/Cobalt salts/Titanium Dioxide etc.) along with the carrier matrix e.g. cellulose and if your sanding paper is quartz (sand/silicon dioxide) based the possibilty of RCS
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.