Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
S Gibson  
#1 Posted : 03 April 2018 10:43:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
S Gibson

Does anyone have dealings with pre-school regarding Risk Assessments that will cover OFSTED regulations

SBH  
#2 Posted : 03 April 2018 14:00:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

Do you mean a nursery or a pre school hours school club?

SBH

S Gibson  
#3 Posted : 03 April 2018 14:14:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
S Gibson

Proper Pre_school  Mornings and afternoons

A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 04 April 2018 09:23:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

How can OFSTED expect you to produce these documents if they have not issued any guidance? Could it be because - “Ofsted is not a health and safety authority and it is not responsible for auditing health and safety standards within the learning environment.”?

That is a quote from https://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/i/ofsted%20and%20health%20and%20safety.pdf

Anything that OFSTED produces in relation to H&S is not regulations, nor an ACoP. It is not even “Best Industry Practice”; it is just the opinion of a group of educationalists based on their “common sense”. For example I come across places where the OFSTE inspectors have insisted that pre-school nurseries have those plastic covers on sockets which, every H&S professional knows, are at best useless and at worse dangerous. See this DoH guidance note about the use of socket covers- https://www.health-ni.go.../health/EFA-2016-002.pdf

Use your H&S knowledge and understanding to produce the appropriate risk assessments based on what the HSE require. This is a start- http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/classroom-checklist.pdf. More on HSE website.

thanks 2 users thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
Steve e ashton on 04/04/2018(UTC), O'Donnell54548 on 07/04/2018(UTC)
S Gibson  
#5 Posted : 04 April 2018 09:29:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
S Gibson

Thanks for that  i e-mailed OFSTED and as you say they have no guidence but expect to see documentation in the files! i will work with the manager and use my experience and her input to come up with RAs

thanks 1 user thanked S Gibson for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 04/04/2018(UTC)
O'Donnell54548  
#6 Posted : 04 April 2018 13:43:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
O'Donnell54548

Kurdziel - whats wrong with OFSTED saying that: "we would expect our subject specialist inspectors to have a working knowledge of the relevant guidance from the Health and Safety Executive. However, inspectors are not health and safety experts and cannot be expected to have the detailed knowledge which appropriately qualified specialists in this field possess". Is that not the reason why his employer gave S Gibson the job? this includes the reasons not to use socket covers.

A Kurdziel  
#7 Posted : 05 April 2018 09:32:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Originally Posted by: O'Donnell54548 Go to Quoted Post

Kurdziel - whats wrong with OFSTED saying that: "we would expect our subject specialist inspectors to have a working knowledge of the relevant guidance from the Health and Safety Executive. However, inspectors are not health and safety experts and cannot be expected to have the detailed knowledge which appropriately qualified specialists in this field possess". Is that not the reason why his employer gave S Gibson the job? this includes the reasons not to use socket covers.

 Exactly OFSTED are not H&S specialists but organizations are expected to have access to competent Health and Safety advisers who in these circumstances will know better that the OFSTED inspectors. They need to apply their knowledge to the situation and not be swayed by “suggestions” by OFTSED (or insurance companies, or trades union representatives etc.)

thanks 2 users thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
O'Donnell54548 on 06/04/2018(UTC), lorna on 10/04/2018(UTC)
SNS  
#8 Posted : 06 April 2018 09:39:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SNS

If you trawl the HSE website http://www.hse.gov.uk/services/education/index.htm there is some general guidance available.

have a look at some schools websites, some have nurseries / pre-school embeded and many have their policies and RA available to view for comparison and download

O'Donnell54548  
#9 Posted : 06 April 2018 09:48:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
O'Donnell54548

Originally Posted by: A Kurdziel Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: O'Donnell54548 Go to Quoted Post

Kurdziel - whats wrong with OFSTED saying that: "we would expect our subject specialist inspectors to have a working knowledge of the relevant guidance from the Health and Safety Executive. However, inspectors are not health and safety experts and cannot be expected to have the detailed knowledge which appropriately qualified specialists in this field possess". Is that not the reason why his employer gave S Gibson the job? this includes the reasons not to use socket covers.

 Exactly OFSTED are not H&S specialists but organizations are expected to have access to competent Health and Safety advisers who in these circumstances will know better that the OFSTED inspectors. They need to apply their knowledge to the situation and not be swayed by “suggestions” by OFTSED (or insurance companies, or trades union representatives etc.)

I agree, I had similar problems in my last job with the CQC.

thanks 2 users thanked O'Donnell54548 for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 06/04/2018(UTC), lorna on 10/04/2018(UTC)
Xavier123  
#10 Posted : 06 April 2018 13:01:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Xavier123

Originally Posted by: O'Donnell54548 Go to Quoted Post

I agree, I had similar problems in my last job with the CQC.

Except CQC ARE h&s inspectors these days post Staffordshire hospital reviews.

A Kurdziel  
#11 Posted : 06 April 2018 13:45:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

That’s not strictly speaking true: the CQC are not H&S inspectors under Health and Safety at Work Act. The MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) explains the areas which the HSE/LA’s cover and those that CGC cover. There is overlap but they are separate areas.  See http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20180202_mou_between_cqc_hse_las.pdf for a copy of the MOU.

The only bodies that enforce the Health and Safety at Work Act are:

Anybody else who tells you that what they are doing is enforcing the Health and Safety at Work Act is lying.

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
O'Donnell54548 on 07/04/2018(UTC)
O'Donnell54548  
#12 Posted : 07 April 2018 14:21:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
O'Donnell54548

Thank you Kurdziel, save me a lot of typing :)

Ian A-H  
#13 Posted : 07 April 2018 18:30:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ian  A-H

In my experience Ofsted THINK they're H&S inspectors!!

Xavier123  
#14 Posted : 09 April 2018 08:56:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Xavier123

Originally Posted by: A Kurdziel Go to Quoted Post

That’s not strictly speaking true: the CQC are not H&S inspectors under Health and Safety at Work Act. The MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) explains the areas which the HSE/LA’s cover and those that CGC cover. There is overlap but they are separate areas.  See http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20180202_mou_between_cqc_hse_las.pdf for a copy of the MOU.

The only bodies that enforce the Health and Safety at Work Act are:

Anybody else who tells you that what they are doing is enforcing the Health and Safety at Work Act is lying.

Not lost on me but was aiming for a one line response.

"Whilst not being authorised inspectors under HASWA, CQC ARE 'inspecting' for reasons of health and safety and in many situations are applying HSE guidance" might have been a better line....  There is a reason a bunch of HSE officers went to train, join and assist the CQC at the time of the first MoU.

Legionella is a good example in which the burden was recently shifted in the latest MoU more clearly towards CQC enforcement over HSE/LA.

Still at least some formalisation of CQC role exists here unlike OFSTED.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.