Rank: Super forum user
|
Good morning
We are being asked by our independant inspection company to provide electric shock posters in our lift motor rooms. I know this is good practice and it is something I have always seen but I cannot remember why we do this and where the guidance comes from.
Can anyone enlighten me
Thank you
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I did a quick bit of Googling a while back as I was wondering the exact same thing. I seem to recall finding that it used to be a requirement a while back, but isn't anymore. I'm sure someone more informed may correct me or add some more info! I do wonder if there is any point to a poster - if some gets electrocuted, do you really have the time to read a poster on the wall before taking action?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I did a quick google as well and couldn’t find anything either. Perhaps it is a left over from the Factories Act. Why don’t you ask the company doing the audit why they think you need poster? After all they should be auditing you against some sort of standard and not just on the basis of partially remembered obsolete legislation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The Electricity (Factories Act) Special Regulations 1908 & 1944 required an Occupier of a factory to display an abstract of the regulations and the electric shock placard. These requirements were not included in the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989. However, the guidance on the regs says: Emergency resuscitation and first aid 224 You should consider placing notices or placards giving details of emergency resuscitation procedures in the event of electric shock at those locations where people may be at greater risk of electric shock. Guidance to Inspectors states (3) There is no specific requirement under the EAW Regulations for the display of an electric shock placard or an abstract of the 1908/1944 Regulations. Occupiers should be told to remove abstracts but advised to retain placards where these are appropriate
|
 3 users thanked Granlund40055 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am impressed with Granlund40055’s research! Just thinking about it could it be that back then (probably 1908 and maybe even in 1944) people less familiar with electrical hazards and for example might not realise that for example if someone was being electrocuted what you don’t do is grab hold of them. The suggestion is that such a sign might still be necessary is in the current guidance and I suppose whether you need one should be down to a risk assessment. If that is the case why did the original posters audits insist that he needed one?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.