Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ppb  
#1 Posted : 20 April 2018 15:32:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ppb

If a staff member working in a hospital is exposed to a patient with Tuberculosis or another Hazard Group 3 or 4 pathogen and is referred to the Occupational Health Service (staff not confirmed as contradicted TB at this stage), would this be reportable to the HSENI under RIDDOR regulations as a dangerous occurrence? ( Would Dangerous Occurrence No. 7 Biological agents-Any accident or incident which resulted or could have resulted in the release 7 or escape of a biological agent likely to cause severe human infection or illness or Dangerous occurrence No.20  Escape of substances "The accidental release or escape of any substance in a quantity sufficient to 21 cause the death, major injury or any other damage to the health of any person" apply in this situation.

Look forward to members thoughts on this issue.

Edited by user 20 April 2018 15:33:45(UTC)  | Reason: delete wording Dangerous occurrence no.19

Kate  
#2 Posted : 21 April 2018 10:38:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

HSE has some guidance here:

http://www.hse.gov.uk/biosafety/biologagents.pdf

Examples of reportable and non-reportable incidents are given on p.50 and include:

Reportable as a disease: a nurse catches TB after nursing a patient with TB

Non-reportable: a nurse is found to be MRSA positive (but free from disease) during routine screening after having nursed patients infected with MRSA

Reportable as a dangerous occurrence: a nurse suffers a needlestick injury from a needle and syringe known to contain hepatitis B-positive blood

It seems to be a bit of a minefield!

Edited by user 21 April 2018 10:39:55(UTC)  | Reason: poor copying skills

A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 23 April 2018 08:49:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

It all depends on whether there is evidence of infection and that it likely that it is acquired from work.   TB is terrible disease to quantify as it takes so long to culture (grow). 28 days in the first instance. Basic immunological tests like the Heath test confirm exposure but do not necessary show the presence of an active disease: for example if you have had a TB jab it will show up positive. We once had an employee who was apparently positive for TB but there was no evidence that the exposure was work related and when we informed the HSE they said to wait until it was positively identified. After waiting 3 months we gave up and never reported. On the other hand I know of places where there was a failure of safe procedures and an employee ended up working with tissue contain active TB( from a cow) this was reported to the HSE and a s**t storm resulted.    They were not infected just potetially might have been.

As Kate said a minefield

Users browsing this topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.