Originally Posted by: safetyamateur

My brain is woefully small when it comes to this but do any of you know about this question mark over wifi large organisations.

https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-4/reveh-2016-0060/reveh-2016-0060.xml?format=INT&utm_source=emailmarketing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=open_letter_to_damian_hinds&utm_content=2018-10-12

Two years ago an independant consultant asserted that the official UK advisory body that reports on safety of electromagnetic fields is all in cahoots with someone-or-other and is covering up something-or-other and the WHO should do something about it.

Maybe they are, but while they remain the official UK advisory body, I don't think there's anything to be done about it.  It looks like just another one of the many, many assertions that this that or the other is killing us all (artifical grass sports pitches, MMR vaccines, etc).  If there's no credible action to take, it doesn't seem to be something worth worrying about.

Have a look at the official Public Health England website here https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/electromagnetic-fields

In summary it says that yes we are exposed to all sorts of artificial electromagnetic fields but as far as they can assess the energy levels of most of these field is too low to have any long lasting effects. Of course it could be a conspiracy but what is in dispute is what the safe level is and how far we should err on caution but for most people most of the time this is a purely theoretical argument.