Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RackMan  
#1 Posted : 30 October 2025 23:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
RackMan

I’m looking for advice regarding the supply of safety information (Maximum Safe Working Load Data) from a manufacturer of pallet racking. 

Most manufacturers supply their racking with maximum safe load capacity data for the use of their racking systems. I have a client who has no safe load signs for their racking system. I have requested the OEM for SWL information, and they have said they will only supply information if I basically hand over my client to them, that the racking must be reinstalled by contractors of their approval, and that racking supplied before 2014 will not have any SWL information supplied, thus rendering it technically unusable.

Any advice is welcome on what facets are at play here with regard to statutory duties and liabilities of the manufacturer, albeit hypothetically.

PDarlow  
#2 Posted : 31 October 2025 08:33:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
PDarlow

Hello Rackman,

The manufacturer of the racking system or even the supplier / installer of the system should be able to help without any charge or poacing of your client. You are after 'load notices / signs'.

Depending on type of racking, you would be required to carry out measurements such as depth of frame, height to first beam (and type), beam length and depth, duty of uprights, for example T20, how many levels in the bay, what is the maximum load to be stored in the racks, etc. With this information, they shoul dbe able to use their calculator to determine the total load and load per bay. I couldn't find any online calculators or I would have done it myself so I contacted our supplier and they were more than willing to help.

I had done this recently with very old, but still perfectly servicable racking that had its configuration changed. Albeit, it was for Apex adjustable racking. Maybe easier to calculate than other systems.

Hope this helps.

thanks 1 user thanked PDarlow for this useful post.
peter gotch on 31/10/2025(UTC)
peter gotch  
#3 Posted : 31 October 2025 11:43:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Morning RackMan

You know more about the DOs and DON'Ts of racking that I do, so I will treat your question at face value. i.e. you want comment on the legal niceties.

If the racking manufacturer who has been approached for information is not the original manufacturer/supplier is NOT the company (or its predecessor identity) then I can quite see why this company would want to see this as a a business opportunity.

However, what I don't understand is why the year 2014 might have some magical signficance EVEN if that was the date in which some, e.g. SEMA guidance was published or updated.

Section 6(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 put duties on manufacturers and suppliers of any "article for use at work" to do certain things inclusive of providing information.

The term in brackets is defined in Section 53 of the Act by cross-reference to "plant".

" plant " includes any machinery, equipment or appliance ;

Note that the definition says "includes" so is NOT exhaustive.

Not much doubt in my mind that racking in a warehouse used as a workplace counts as "plant", not least as there was plenty of case law interpreting the term BEFORE the 1974 Act was passed.

Almost all of HSWA including Section 6 came into force on 1 April 1975 and whilst I wasn't working as an OSH professional at that time, racking has come with information for as long as I have been an OSH professional. 

Now there probably IS plenty of racking still in use in the UK which predates 1975, but otherwise some argument that a need for information with racking is in some way "new" is groundless.

If the original manufacturer is out of business or uncooperative (for whatever reason) it might be that your Client needs to go back to first principles and follow some of the considerations you have mentioned in earlier activity on these Forums.

Good luck, Peter

Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 31 October 2025 14:03:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

By default you could also apply SI 2005 No 1803 The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 which places obligations on the market supplier to provide a safe product and ensure the customer has sufficient instruction and information to use the product safely. A load chart would be such a piece of information.

These obligations have since been copied across in to many of the supply chain regulations e.g. Construction Products, Pressure Vessels etc. 

Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 31 October 2025 14:03:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

By default you could also apply SI 2005 No 1803 The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 which places obligations on the market supplier to provide a safe product and ensure the customer has sufficient instruction and information to use the product safely. A load chart would be such a piece of information.

These obligations have since been copied across in to many of the supply chain regulations e.g. Construction Products, Pressure Vessels etc. 

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.