Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 July 2002 02:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Alexander I am looking for any information or links regarding causal relationship between glioblastoma multiforme and occupational exposure. So far the possibilities are acrylonitriles, electromagnetic fields, chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons and vinyl chloride. No detail on these. Any help much appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 July 2002 08:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor The texts refer to ionising radiation but although this is one of the most common brain tumours, they don't seem to have established much by way of occupational cause.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 July 2002 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Preston From Hunter's diseases of occupations, 9th edition, 2000 (ch. 39, p 810) Occupational Cancer: Clinical and epidemiological aspects: Specific tumour sites: BRAIN "Brain tumours show a bimodal frequency distribution with a small peak in childhood and a second, larger, peak in the seventh decade. The majority of adult malignant tumours are astrocytomata or undifferentiated glioblastomata. Mortality rates are rising in developed countries but this may be, at least in part, due to improved accuracy of certification. "Occupational factors have been invoked in recent years. Reviews suggested that both professional and manual occupations had been reported to be at increased risk. These include; laboratory workers, petrochemical plant workers and embalmers. "Certain, possibly multiple, chemical exposures may be common features. These include certain organic solvents, as well as ionizing radiation. "Recent additions to this list might include lead but the greatest interest of late has centred around the possibility that electric fields or magnetic fields (or both) from residential or occupational exposure might be associated with an increased risk of brain tumours. Thorough reviews of residential exposure studies and meta-analysis of the brain cancer risks from occupational exposures have failed to resolve the issue. Studies subsequent to these reviews have not clarified this putative risk." NB I haven't given the six references in this passage - contact me off-list if you'd like them
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.